• dwalin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    7 months ago

    I belive the beds in a store that sells beds are either to be sold or to help you choose a bed. They are not “fuck you, see how many beds i have” beds

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’ll probably be sold at a discount too since it was for display

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          Right but equally it’s not the mattress company’s job to accommodate the homeless person. It’s not like they didn’t have to pay an inflated price from the manufacturer so if they sold it for the price of the materials they’d probably make a loss.

          • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 months ago

            No of course not. I’m not saying that the homeless guy should be in the store, I’m saying it’s out of his reach even for the floor model.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        100%. I have yet to see somewhere that sells display furniture/appliances at full price, usually they knock some off due to shop guests messing around with it, wear and tear

        • 0ops@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean I don’t even wanna know how often the average person changes their sheets, let alone their mattress. My parents have mattresses in spare bedrooms older than me.

          Honestly though, display beds aren’t as scary to me as hotel beds

          • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            7 months ago

            SPARE BEDROOMS?!! By this you mean they have beds to spare and yet are not allowing unhoused individuals to sleep in them?? How very dare they. Guest rooms should be illegal. Everyone with a bedroom to spare gets a mini homeless shelter in their house.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how capitalism works. It very much is a “fuck you look at our expensive shit” society.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s what everything everywhere is. Many folks in communist countries lack things others have too.

        Only in a hypothetical utopia could all persons have all things equally.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          Especially because unless you’ve solved the limited resources problem, then even in a utopia you’re still going to have to have something like money, and therefore you will still have things that some people have that other people don’t have.

          • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            What essential resources are so limited that we can’t provide them to everyone based on need?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Define ‘limited.’ Because limits include trained manpower, right? There’s only a certain amount of that. Our ability to provide certain drugs for everyone who might need them are limited by the number of people trained to make them. This is true of virtually any industry. It is as limited as the number of people who can make it usable. And that is usually not an ‘anyone can do this’ issue.

              • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Labor of any stripe is abundant. In an economy that doesn’t prioritize profit, people would be able to pursue specialized jobs that they want to contribute towards. For example, after the modernization of the USSR, they had the most doctors of any country in the world and healthcare was made accessible for millions of people. Our growth as a society is limited by the amount of cooperative labor we have available, but it’s not a limited resource.

                In contrast, capitalism is reliant on a reserve pool of labor to keep wages down. If someone remains in the reserves for too long, they become homeless because every aspect of life has been commodified.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I’m not talking about labor, I’m talking about specialized labor. Which is limited not just to numbers but to numbers willing to be trained in that field.

                  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Which specialized labor do you think would be in short supply in a non-market economy?

        • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Which things? Because all historical sources show that the bottom 10% had all the bare necessities for life. They didn’t have luxury apartments, but they had a roof. They weren’t eating steak every night, but they had more caloric input and healthier diets than US citizens.