• FarraigePlaisteach@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Absolutely true. But under what system is there significantly less exploitation? Too many people are selfish, cruel or both.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Naturally, a system that promotes wealth distribution and not one that promotes wealth capture.

      This is a situation where the only correct answer is to change direction. Do not set requirements for perfection when even mild improvement is so easily attained.

      EDIT: One specific step would be to make worker-owned corporations a requirement. The stock market can stick around for all I care, but the business capital should only ever be controlled by the actual workers. That doesn’t mean companies would have to restructure or fire executives. Delegation of duty is absolutely a thing.

      Normal people wouldn’t have to worry at all about such a change. Though maybe if their job was figuring out how to cut meat off the company for profit, they might have to worry…

      • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        So conquer the world and force it on it because otherwise how do you control what the Congo does to their children?

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          How about we start with punishing companies that knowingly integrate shave labor into their supply chains?

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          That can be done without colonialism, imperialism, or invasion. Much like how the EU is forcing American tech companies to be less shitty.