• MotoAsh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Naturally, a system that promotes wealth distribution and not one that promotes wealth capture.

    This is a situation where the only correct answer is to change direction. Do not set requirements for perfection when even mild improvement is so easily attained.

    EDIT: One specific step would be to make worker-owned corporations a requirement. The stock market can stick around for all I care, but the business capital should only ever be controlled by the actual workers. That doesn’t mean companies would have to restructure or fire executives. Delegation of duty is absolutely a thing.

    Normal people wouldn’t have to worry at all about such a change. Though maybe if their job was figuring out how to cut meat off the company for profit, they might have to worry…

    • Ataraxia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So conquer the world and force it on it because otherwise how do you control what the Congo does to their children?

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        How about we start with punishing companies that knowingly integrate shave labor into their supply chains?

      • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That can be done without colonialism, imperialism, or invasion. Much like how the EU is forcing American tech companies to be less shitty.