• yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not my cup of tea for the price. It’s the same price as a switch lite and you need a ps5 to use it, and you need to be on the same physical network too…

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. Steamlink has been a thing for ages. I even still have a physical steamlink box somewhere in storage. Same premise, somewhat nicer execution.

  • Holyginz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m already able to use remote play on my laptop which is only slightly less convenient and can work outside of my home. Why would I want to spend so much for a mobile option that isn’t very mobile?

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      People who are too poor for more than 1 TV to play games on but rich enough to buy another 1/2 of a PS5 to keep gaming when someone else wants to use the TV.

      Edit: Also people who thought the Wii U was a good idea.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Parents would be my guess. Who don’t want a TV or gaming system in a kids room but would like to allow them to play games while a sibling or parent is using the TV.