• schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You misunderstood, don’t drive and put other peoples lives in danger if you can’t afford the proper monitoring. And I do support universal health care, but that isn’t what universal health care is in the slightest……… There is a line and if it cost tax payers money so you can drive when you could just take the bus as another method…. Yeah… come on mate….

    Not everyone needs to drive, it’s a privilege, not a right. Universal health care is so you can live and function, not so you can have the luxuries that some healthy people can’t even afford…. Totally different things mate.

    • spudsrus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The sensors allow better control and management of diabetes.

      People with proper diabetic control are less likely to require hospitalisation or other costly treatment for all the bad stuff associated with poor sugar control.

      Totally agree that you shouldn’t drive if you aren’t in control of sugar levels but disagree on sensors not being healthcare.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Top of line ones aren’t, just like the bus example, there is other just as viable cheaper options. If someone wants to drive, that’s on them to afford the more expensive one so they can utilize their privilege to drive.