Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

      • Afghaniscran@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m from the UK so I can vouch that the government are actively shitty to it’s not rich people.

        • supert@lemmy.sdfeu.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If I want to explain the class system to someone from a former colony, I start with colonialism, but practised at home.

      • Ilandar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not disagreeing with you, but the point to understand here is that Australia cannot even make it over the very first hurdle. Indigenous peoples are recognised in Canada’s constitution, the Canadian government has signed many treaties over hundreds of years and Canada even has a form of Indigenous self-governance in Nunavut. Australia cannot get anywhere even close to these things. Constitutional recognition was just rejected, widespread treaty making is only in its infancy and self-governance is an absolute pipe dream.

        Other former colonies may be shitty towards their Indigenous peoples, but at the very least there is generally some form of recognition of their importance as Indigenous. In Australia, we do not even see Indigenous peoples as Indigenous. We don’t understand what that word actually means. So much of the commentary from No voters during this referendum was about how Indigenous Australians are just another racial minority group, equating them with Chinese Australians, Indian Australians, etc. People fundamentally do not understand the difference, because they do not understand the history of their own country.

        • Whirlybird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          One of the stupid things they did with this referendum was they bundled the constitutional recognition along with the stupid “voice to parliament”. If they did 2 questions, or just the recognition one, I have no doubt the constitutional recognition would have passed with easily 60%+.

          Constitutional recognition? Good.

          “The Voice”? Bad.

      • blargerer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        It could be ignorance, but as a Canadian of European descent, I’d have claimed we were passively shitty more than actively shitty.