• silent_water [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trans people is a whole other rabbit hole, they say they are either a man or a woman but refuse to be called by it and want to be called trans man/woman, cause they want to be special

    lmao what? no call me a woman, I’m totally fine with that. I’m only a trans woman with friends.

    • “i can’t even deal with these transjenders! they all want me to [made up rule that no trans person ever asked them to do]!”

      The victim complex of these people is staggering. like just make 1 trans friend. or even an acquaintance. shit is honestly not complicated at all.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    And it’s even funnier

    Raging chuds and libs stop saying things are “funny/interesting/ironic/curious” when what they mean is they’re enraged challenge. Difficulty level: “It’s almost as if”

    • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      AFAIK it’s something like “the term itself is a bit niche, latine is maybe more common as a gender neutral term, but anyone making a fuss about it is a chud.”

      Elsewhere in this thread this was said.

      I’ve met some leftists latine people with different takes, including “linguistic gender is different and latino is already inclusive” but I’ve seen enough nonbinary latine people say otherwise to not take that seriously (plus it was on a server dominanted by people with really bad takes like xenogenders bad and kink at pride bad. Predominantly ML server as well its a weird culture.)

      • WithoutFurtherDelay [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        plus it was on a server dominanted by people with really bad takes like xenogenders bad and kink at pride bad.

        Someone should do a study to see if queer people who have one bad take about their own community tend to have the rest. I hypothesize the existence of a transmed mindset that leads to it, “respectability politics above all else”.

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interestingly, they aren’t transmeds, but the trans person that enables the rest of them to be shitty by telling them their opinions are ok is very much an assilimationist and that drives a lot of her opinions. Oddly she isnt against neos either though. So she doesnt have EVERY bad opinion you can have.

          • WithoutFurtherDelay [they/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, obviously everyone in the group isn’t going to have the same exact set of takes (especially less likely to actually be transmed now that it’s more universally hated) but that might still be correlations

            • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Her take on xenogenders is that its “not a materialist take on what gender is” (she’s like, almost religiously obsessed with materialism in a weird way) and when me and some other people tried to point out that this is like the exact same thing faux-Marxists transmeds say, and indeed what faux-Marxist full on transphobes say, she said “yeah but in this case I’m right”.

    • i’m not a spanish speaker, so what i have to say doesn’t rly matter, but i’ve yet to see it championed by a predominantly spanish-speaking organization or activist.

      in general i think generating new linguistic signifiers for having the right politics is easily confused with having the right politics, which is easily confused with actually doing politics.

  • motherofmonsters [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Truly some of the dumbest motherfuckers. No shade to anyone who enjoys Destiny, but seems like looter shooters really attract the lowest common denominator of gamers.

    • SkeletorJesus [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As somebody who enjoys a whole lot of dumb guy games, my experience is that looter shooters often attract edgelords and people who overly serious about themselves and the video games they play. It’s a pain in the ass demographic, but I think there’s still a worse contingent in Old School Runescape. IMO, it’s without question the most forwardly nazi/neckbeard audience of any mainstream game. I mean like “if you go to any popular training spot and play for an hour, you’ll see at least one conversation about whether women are getting too uppity or if (((they))) are human” level awful. They have a yearly pride parade in-game run by the devs and every year and the hate was so bad they have to explicitly say in the newspost for it that crashing it will get you banned, no warnings.

    • UmbraVivi [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      “killingjoke96” lmfao

      I thought that line was pretty good when I heard it in Cyberpunk, but I underestimated how unbelievably dense gamers are. These people really played through that entire game and went away thinking “this is just like pronouns”.

  • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Saying “The majority of Spanish speaking communities object to the use of novel nonbinary suffixes” isn’t really context any more than saying “The majority of english speakers hate nonbinary pronouns.”

    Okay, so there are a fuckton of spanish speaking bigots? Thanks. Never would have guessed. The context that would actually be useful here is what nonbinary spanish speaking communities think of these.

    • Dessa [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Um, actually, that’s not gramatically correct!” No shit? You mean that people trying to reform a language aren’t sticking to the current language standards? Incredible.

    • ferristriangle [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I was going to ask is there genuinely a more preferred term that non-binary people like to use, or is this more akin to people throwing a tantrum similar to “You can’t use they as a singular pronoun!! You want me to refer to you as multiple people?!?!?”

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Latine or latin@ have been used. Latine is more of what I see. Latinx is a largely American creation from what I’ve seen and is difficult to pronounce in Spanish. Latine is a lot more natural to say.

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh boy. The LatinX argument. Nobody I know is even really aware of it and the few that are tend to have studied abroad or consume a lot of Anglo media. The right-wing in the capitol hates the word and uses it as an example of “American woke culture” brainwashing us.

    I’m not really fond of it because it’s difficult to pronounce and sounds goofy. US latinos are more than welcome to use it if it’s their preference. We have ours that work well for us.