yes, this is true. no, this isn’t why wages haven’t kept up with productivity growth or why you must work 40 hours to sustain yourself. you have to work because profit earned must increase and paying you even one iota more than you need to be able to show up to work again tomorrow is a loss of profit. if they could make you work 80 hours a week or 160, they would in heartbeat.

thankfully, this is outlawed because labor movements of the past fought to enshrine in law a limit on how much you can be forced to work and set a minimum bar for how much they can pay you. these laws are under fire - I explore why in the rest of this reply - and will be repealed eventually if labor does not resist collectively.

however, the rate of profit always decreases on a long enough timescale because of dead labor (technology, machines, etc), inter-capitalist competition - capitalists will steal profit from each other if there’s more to be had - and because infinite growth is impossible so eventually externalities will always overcome the creation of new capital.

consequently, capital accumulates in the hands of the capital-owning class - an ever-shrinking group of them, at that - and this continues until you, the worker, make so little that you cannot actually show up to work the next day - the loss of social reproduction. reproduction here doesn’t only refer to progeny but also feeding, clothing, housing, etc. yourself and your family, the meeting of the basic necessities that allow you to continue working, including your health - physical and mental. capital eternally strives to reduce what it must subsidize on your behalf as ensuring you can take better care of yourself reduces profits. a capitalist that makes more profit outcompetes and drives out of business all others who choose to make less profit, eventually.

this is also why capitalism has cyclical recessions, a fact predicted in the 1870s and termed crises of capitalism, when capital has accumulated in too few hands, profit can no longer be made, and workers struggle to feed themselves. you’re just noticing Marx’s second law - the law of capital accumulation.

there are exactly 4 division algebras (over the field of real numbers): the real numbers, the complex numbers, the quaternions, and the octonians. you can’t add any more complex parts because you lost associativity with the octonians. I’m not entirely sure how the first domino leads to the last, though.

China also appears to be improving on this in real time, though official policy still lags behind e.g. Cuba.

idk, I just know that the old instance already have problems with power users and reifying that will make the problem worse.

I think this was always an intended feature (I’ve certainly been hearing about it for years as something people want/devs want to add), in addition to a user tagging system (i.e. users adding tags to their own usernames (e.g. pronoun tags). the main difference, though, was that it was something the poster or mods/admins could add and not something for the userbase at large to vote on. I think making it a voting system allows abuse. like consider a large group of transphobes adding tags to posts in trans comms, for instance.

a trusted user system is it’s own can of worms.

calling retail workers “managers” was a ploy to get around giving them union benefits.

I was really hoping to find a mod that recognized that N/plasma were completely right and that you as the player should join them. alas, no such mod exists.

try radical red sometime. it’s a mod that forces you to learn competitive strategies and team building because the AI is not only playing to win, but it also has access to things like favorable terrain that you can’t change.

ppb isn’t an insult, it’s more “bad take” than “you suck”. it does mean you’re going to get insults if you keep going down that path, though. redirecting - like you’ve done - will change the kind of responses you get. “post hog” is the actual insult and it means you’ve left the plane of human compassion.

the French?? no, fuck no, you cumskins can have them.

you’ve missed the text in picking up the subtext. the comparison of circumcision to sexual violence is wild on it’s face. it gets wilder when you know he means all SV. I can’t tell if you’re missing the misogyny and how inappropriate it is to use this thread to go off about how terrible circumcision is - a practice I am unequivocally not defending - or if you straight up can’t read.

he literally - in those exact words - said it’s worse than

and that it’s a greater harm than western women know. he’s doing a lot more than being racist.

and if you click into the thread, you’d see that he’s downplaying SA to the point that he said it’s worse to break a leg.

seriously dude read the OP. I’m not talking about subtext. you’ve failed to read the actual text.

smdh, we were too late

ooh you would have had a point if you used dictionary dot com but since you didn’t, death to honkies, crackers, s, et cetera

yeah, the mods are going to ban you if you don’t post a nice, well-lit picture of your penis. so do that real quick.

read the OP! it’s literally the subject of this thread!

omg hexbear circumcision is not worse than SA. please be normal.

yes, that is what they responded to.

I’m not mad enough anymore. I knew this guy was short a couple of crayons from the OP but now I just feel mean.

hmm I tried dunking but this guy might not be smart enough for that even to be fun. like if they can’t even process that you just compared them to a troglodyte, what’s left to do?