KobaCumTribute [she/her]

  • 18 Posts
  • 129 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 6th, 2020

help-circle

  • Training is great and everything, but a starter bird wouldn’t win in a matchup with any fully evolved mon, let alone a legendary.

    Ironically I was just thinking “like what if evolution trees were more fleshed out and went further, so some filler trash like pidgey ends up having a path to turn into the legendary birds or something comparable.” And the more I thought about how, mechanically, that would work I came to the ironic conclusion that instead of pokemon being looter-shooter weapons, they should be more like the weapons from Monster Hunter in having trees and upgrades.

    Then again all of the Pokemon values they express in the series falls apart when you look at the fact that it’s possible to trade a Pokemon, and there’s an incentive to do so. It really fucked me up as a kid seeing ash trade his Butterfree and then later feeling sad when Butterfree left on his own accord and was sad. Pokemon are depicted as sentient and it’s bizarre at this point they still incentivize trading with the tagline: Gotta Catch’em All!

    Yeah, that disconnect between how the story is just “they’re real and smart and your friend” and everything else is “so we gotta sell two identical versions of the same game but with different collectables, and we gotta move all these gacha card packs, and…”


  • It’s frustrating to think about the proposed ideology of Pokemon about stewardship, compassion, and working together when the franchise itself is just that, a franchise.

    Tangential to that, it always annoyed me growing up with the media and the games that key to all the stories is the idea of individual pokemon actually being important and growing meaningfully as part of a largely static team, but in the games they’re just disposable type, stat, and move pools that get switched out or binned indefinitely and your static team at the end is a bunch of stuff you caught in the last fifth of the game or less. The one, singular exception to that in my experience was when I caught a shiny vulpix in one of the gym challenges in Sword (of all places), and that became my sweeper for the entire rest of the game and both DLCs, but that’s the most edge case of all edge cases being something that was insanely rare and special in its own right, that was also a very strong and viable pokemon, with nearly perfect stats on top of that.

    Like there’s a huge disconnect between the sort of collecting gameplay and the story about growth and whatnot, since you’re basically playing a looter shooter and the pokemon are just new weapon rolls to be evaluated and kept or tossed, and none of the franchise’s mechanical attempts at fixing this have worked because they’re always just limited gimmicks that can’t get in the way of that core looter-shooter progression loop.

    Consequently, I’ve always wanted to see something where a given pokemon’s progression is more fluid and has higher peaks than just “this is a one stage low-stat trash mon and that’s all it will ever be, bin” or “this has one mid-tier evolution that comes super early, good early game bruiser and then trash as soon as something better comes along,” as long as you actually invest in it and keep it around. But I don’t think Pokemon could ever do something like that, because that turns it into an RPG where pokemon are mechanically characters instead of weapons and the evolutions or whatever are like classes they prestige into instead of fixed forms.







  • There’s no proof of ai generation being used in palworld itself

    Also the timeline for that doesn’t line up. AI generated art was absolute dogshit at the point in the dev cycle where it could have been used, and by the time it reached the “maybe make some concept art to be reimagined as a 3d model” level they’d have to have been in the final stretch towards making it playable. Even now, “AI art” for a 3d game is theoretically using it to upscale, clean up, and detail a rough sketch, something that’s only been done in proof-of-concept things AFAIK.

    They did seemingly just straight up rip pokemon 3d models and then change them up in blender though which is extremely funny and literally stealing directly from Nintendo is laudable in almost any circumstance, but they are probably going to get completely fucked in the courts over it, lmao.







  • fascists and excusing their crimes because ‘they made the trains run on time’

    The dumbest part of that is that Mussolini’s policies “made the trains run on time” by placing enormous pressures on the rail workers and eschewing maintenance and safe operating procedures, causing some marginal increase in normal punctuality at the cost of massively increasing deadly accidents and shutdowns from trains derailing.


  • This is a wild tangent, but for some reason that idea reminds me of the novelization of Myst of all things, where a plot point around the whole “creating worlds by describing them in detail” thing involved the protagonist going into obsessive detail about every minor detail of the setting and being scolded for not being minimalist and exclusively focusing on the functional parts like “there’s air” and “this place is useful and also not on fire or made of poison or some shit like that” by his father who erases the added lines, yielding worlds that are shitty and don’t work right.

    For all that it’s a rather on-the-nose allegory for writing and scene setting in general, it’s eerily similar to how stacking the right added details in a prompt can massively impact the entire image, including unrelated parts, in stable diffusion. Like left without them it just sort of fuzzily makes a generic average that might be ok if generic or it might make a limb fold back in on itself, disappear behind a narrow object, and reappear somewhere else entirely like it’s a fucking looney toons gag. But setting up something to painstakingly describe the color and texture of the literal dirt on the ground in the picture can somehow impact and fix the detail and perspective of figures in the scene, like it’s trying to make everything match the intricacy and so not falling into the weird impossible contortion and melting zones.






  • Do not eat whole szechuan peppercorns on their own, especially not if they’re relatively fresh. They’re good to cook with, and I recommend crushing one up and tasting a small piece of it to see what they do and taste like, but if you just pop a whole one in your mouth and chew it up your entire mouth will go numb, begin overproducing saliva which will just spread the effect and overpowering floral taste around and start it running down your throat, and then you’ll start retching and struggling not to vomit.

    They’re a great spice to use, but they’re extremely strong (and have to be, because the numbing chemical in them is heat sensitive and breaks down a bit when cooked, meaning you have to use a lot when cooking to get the effect to come through, not to mention how diluted it gets when mixed into food).