The logical end of the ‘Solution to bad speech is better speech’ has arrived in the age of state-sponsored social media propaganda bots versus AI-driven bots arguing back

  • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand the point you’re making. If airplanes hitting a building can do the same damages chemical weapons…

    Chemical weapons can kill entire areas just like planes hitting buildings. I’m a licensed pilot.

    • orrk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what killed people was the damage to the buildings not the planes themselves, if the twin towers had been a chemical plant (especially one making something like phosgene, mustard gas or chlorine gas) in the middle of NY, the death toll would have made 9/11 look like a wet fart

      • thenightisdark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The chemical plant cannot be a WMD.

        Places cannot be WMD. This is inherent in the word weapon a weapon is not a place. The w in WMD makes it not a place