• evranch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure he was rude, but from the standpoint of his trade, she is a man. She has no female parts and that’s the whole point of his job.

      It’s like handing an electrician a pipe wrench and saying “the wires are leaking, go tighten them up”

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure he was rude

        You’re really just glossing over this.

        He called her a man in several different ways. That’s transphobic, and has nothing to do with his trade.

      • Taleya
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        As has been pointed out several times now in this thread, that’s not correct

        • viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          It has been pointed out exclusively by you, and you have been incorrect on each occasion.

            • Whirlybird
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              A “neo vagina” and a “neo cervix” are not vaginas and cervixes. They don’t need a gynaecologist.

                • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah it seems pretty clear that at least some of the posters here don’t care about the facts of the matter, they want to chant about birth sex, which… mumsnet is –> that way.