• evranch@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sure he was rude, but from the standpoint of his trade, she is a man. She has no female parts and that’s the whole point of his job.

    It’s like handing an electrician a pipe wrench and saying “the wires are leaking, go tighten them up”

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure he was rude

      You’re really just glossing over this.

      He called her a man in several different ways. That’s transphobic, and has nothing to do with his trade.

    • Taleya
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      As has been pointed out several times now in this thread, that’s not correct

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has been pointed out exclusively by you, and you have been incorrect on each occasion.

          • Whirlybird
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            A “neo vagina” and a “neo cervix” are not vaginas and cervixes. They don’t need a gynaecologist.

              • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah it seems pretty clear that at least some of the posters here don’t care about the facts of the matter, they want to chant about birth sex, which… mumsnet is –> that way.