What is your line in the sand?

Edit: thank you all for your responses. I think it’s important as an American we take your view points seriously. I think of a North Korean living inside of North Korea. They don’t really know how bad it is because that is all hidden from them and they’ve never had anything else. As things get worse for Americans it’s important to have your voices because we will become more and more isolated.

Even the guy who said, “lol.” Some people need that sort of sobering reaction.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    No. And I haven’t for a while now. Looking at your electoral system (electoral college, gerrymandering etc.), it probably never was but it was never as obvious as it is now.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      5 days ago

      I grew up in the US and have lived outside it for 10 years now. I would agree with this. Voting and representation have never been total and is definitely less available for many groups. Further things are being stripped away.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Yeah. My wake-up call was quite early in life, when SCOTUS handed the election to GWB. If I was born a generation earlier I’d have called it with Watergate. If I was an ancestor currently dead, I would have called it around the time an assassin put the presidency in the hands of the opposite party, and a drunk asshole subsequently decided reconstruction efforts should fail. Or possibly just prior, when we somehow decided not to hang every man Jack of the confederacy for treason.

      Edit: an earlier still version of me would have overseen the death of a culture brought on by poxy mad white religious extremists, and laughed ruefully to hear that centuries later the utter bastardy continues unchanged.

    • arakhis_@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      exactly, two party system completely pulls the pants down for top1% lobbyism to be rampantly in control

  • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    See, as a German, when I see a country go down the same route as the Weimar Republic after handing over the power to the Nazi party, I think it’s just very obvious. Hitler took some two months to completely destroy democracy, and the US are juuust in the middle of that. History doesn’t repeat, but sometimes it rhymes, and the similarities are just remarkable.

    So yeah, I guess that would be a big fat trench in the sand.

    • unlogic@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      As a German also I agree with this statement. Ostensibly it is a democracy but in reality it’s not. And yes, there is a lot of rhyming going on

  • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    still consider

    It has only two political parties, and a weird system where all votes are not equal and the actual vote majority doesn’t always win.

    It has frequently had multiple people from the same families running for office, and only wealthy people have a shot. Corporations get to lobby for laws in their favour.

    It also spies on its own citizens, holds people indefinitely without trial, has a huge prison population, a militarized police with a high homicide rate, and is the only western nation with the death penalty.

    Trump and Musk are laying bare how fragile the veneer of “democracy” really is in that country.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      To be honest, not even from the start was it a true democracy, the Electoral College is a layer on top of democracy to give different weight to each vote.

  • ThirdConsul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I never considered it a democracy. It’s one-party system with two parties, what can be democratic about it? Smoke and mirrors.

  • Freshparsnip@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    Absolutely not. When laws don’t apply to the president, the jig is up. Trump clearly plans to be in power forever. Either there won’t be elections or they’ll be rigged.

    • arakhis_@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      all those images of venezualen immigrants … being handled like the absolute worst possible being… its crazy

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I barely considered it a democracy as a two party system as the elites controlled it all, but now it’s just even more messed up. They need to hold people accountable and not elect criminals to office.

    I fear for the future of America as a country.

  • wolf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    When was the US the last time a democracy?

    You can vote democrats or republicans, which mostly get bankrolled by the same rich assholes. As a normal citizen of the US you have almost no influence at politics at all, because the media is controlled by rich people, the biggest internet platforms are controlled by rich people, elections are paid for by rich people, …

    The current situation is not a spontaneous, miraculous, magical result of Trump and his gang, it was years in the making by lobby groups, influential/rich/powerful people and neo liberal brainwashing of the masses.

    Same holds true for most other western so called democracies.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 days ago

    Canadian here.

    Before Trump? Ehhh, not really. I’ve always viewed the US as a place where you vote for which oligarch-backed monarch you’d want to put in absolute power for 4 years. Every 4/8 years the new incoming overlord just rips up whatever the previous one did and nothing of substance is actually achieved.

    After Trump 2.0? No. There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Trump is going to surrender all that power he and the GOP have accumulated. And why would he? He doesn’t have to. He literally controls every branch of government that he can and ignores those that he doesn’t. If the US ever has another election it will purely be for show, like China’s elections. The mask is now fully off and the charade of US democracy is over as those who actually wield the power now do so openly on their sleeves.

  • Brownandoffended@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    A struggling democracy, in the beginning of an Orban/Hungary-like overtake of the country.

    Its possible to revert, but you seem to have atleast a 1/3 of the country that would walk down a straight up facist line willingly and happily do so.

    You need to fix your shit america.

  • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    Line in the sand? Going after political opponents. Censoring information. Dismantling media. Abandoning rule of law. Business and government mixing too much.

    USA is speed running these.

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    The US had always been a questionable democracy with the hyperfixation on the president and just two parties setting the agenda, but I’d argue that it’s still a democracy, though it is a rapidly deteriorating one.

    • Dayroom7485@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I am a bit too dumb to understand that graph and asked ai for an explanation. It helped me, maybe it also helps others:

      This graph comes from a study by Gilens and Page that examines how different groups influence U.S. policy decisions. It has three separate charts, each showing how policy adoption (whether a policy is enacted) relates to the preferences of different groups:

      1. Average Citizens’ Preferences (top chart)

      2. Economic Elites’ Preferences (middle chart)

      3. Interest Group Alignments (bottom chart)

      Breaking It Down:

      • X-axis:

      • In the first two graphs, it represents how much each group supports a policy (from 0% to 100%).

      • In the third graph (Interest Groups), the x-axis shows alignment, with negative values meaning opposition and positive values meaning support.

      • Y-axis:

      • The left y-axis (dark line) shows the predicted probability of a policy being adopted.

      • The right y-axis (gray bars) shows how often different levels of support occur in the data (percentage of cases).

      Key Takeaways & Surprises:

      1. The top chart (Average Citizens) is nearly a flat line.

      • This means that whether the general public strongly supports or opposes a policy has little impact on whether it gets adopted.

      2. The middle chart (Economic Elites) has a rising curve.

      • This suggests that policies supported by the wealthy have a much higher chance of being adopted.

      3. The bottom chart (Interest Groups) also shows a strong upward trend.

      • The more interest groups align in favor of a policy, the more likely it is to be adopted.

      Big Picture:

      This graph suggests that the opinions of average citizens have little to no effect on policy decisions, while economic elites and interest groups have significant influence. This challenges the idea that the U.S. operates as a true democracy where the will of the majority decides policy.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Average citizens banding together into interest groups is a pretty common way to get things passed, and this chart agrees.

  • TeaWalker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Am Dutch. I have considered the US an incomplete democracy since I learned about voting in school. It’s not one person one vote, which to me is crucial for a democracy. The US right now is still a nation of laws, but democracy is sharply in decline. The voter-roll issues and Gerrymandering come to mind immediately. Not to mention the fact that guaranteed access to polls has been pulled by the courts. Which is insane to me.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      Also president having so much power was clearly never democratic to begin with as we can see it all play out now.

      • RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        The power of the president did not start out like this. Congress kept giving their power to the executive for political reasons.

        It happened over centuries.

  • zonnewin@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I consider it an autocratic regime with strong fascist characteristics.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I consider America to be a plutocracy, which successfully propagandized the majority with the illusion of democracy, now transitioning into a Christian fascist kleptocracy… Basically a mafia state / corporate dictatorship using religion to control the masses (as is tradition).

      If you think it’s not very Christian, that’s because most Christians consider Jesus’s teachings to be evil communism.