So 2 billion people have to suffer because the libs dont know how the machine works?

I hate the “this is how it’s always been and if we change it society might collapse” argument

The liberal thinks we live in a completely rational meritocratic technocracy!

Bad analogy.

Socialism is a doctor delving into your past medical records and lifestyle to identify the cause and appropriste treatment to get you healthy,

Capitalism is having a chronic issue and being given addicting opiods that ruin sic kill your body over time increasing your dependency and removing you (the problem) from the equation eventually while the doctor ticks his list “another successful patient diagnosis” and accepts funding from the company that made the drugs.

Oh whoops that’s not an analogy. That’s literally real life.

Also socialism is phage therapy, a medical avenue that could help millions and have invalidated the worries around super bugs/mRSA in hospitals if only researched instead of being ignored because the filthy commies invented it.

YoU’rE nOt An EcOnOmIsT

The person’s screaming in pain, the life support is flashing red, the patient is dying due to incredibly foreseeable causes that they would happily prevent, were it not for their doctors having a vested interested in making it happen. They may be alive, but the patient is dying and loudly protesting, and the doctors clearly don’t give a shit - Damn right I’m gonna start working out what those levers do and try to change 'em.

Comparing doctors to economists like they’re remotely comparable is fucking funny.

Capitalist economists are more equivalent to astrologists than a professional science.

• capitalism isn’t a hospital
• capitalism isn’t life support
• the global working class isn’t supported by capitalism
• socialists aren’t random people walking into a hospital fiddling with life support
• capitalism isn’t keeping people clothed and fed
• people are clothing and feeding themselves by selling their labor power to a capitalist for less than it is worth in order to scrape together enough currency to purchase necessities of life
• socialists do in fact understand economics
• marx studied the physiocrats, adam smith, david ricardo, mill, malthus, economic statistics, health statistics, legal documents like the factory acts, etc. for 20 years before finishing Capital
• imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism is full of economic data
• any socialist who writes on unequal exchange or imperialism tends to cite international trade data
• some of the bourgeoisie’s economic hitmen have come forward and admitted what they do for the ruling class in their memoirs
• the CIA and other intelligence agencies in capitalist nations have come forward and declassified their many efforts to sabotage the development of socialist countries through means including but not limited to: assassination, genocide, drug-running, spying, sanctions, coups, embargoes, loans, proxy wars, invasion, colonization, industrial sabotage, agricultural sabotage, poisoning the population, and arming fifth-columnists
• capitalism already causes millions of deaths, mainly through social murder 🦶🗒️
• socialism doesn’t cause deaths, capitalism’s sabotage of attempts to do socialism causes millions of deaths
• capitalism regularly throws people out of work, privatizes people’s means of subsistence, forces people to go into debt and take on internships before they can even find gainful employment, appropriates people’s surplus value, etc.

it’s such a fucking asinine analogy. i’m sure tons of fart sniffing bourgeois looking for reassurance that the exploitation they do is morally good are thrilled to read it.

🦶🗒️:

hooooly shit this person is comparing the “”“”““work””“”“”" economists do to that of doctors

economists are the definition of fiddling with levers. marxian economists are the closest to actual scientifically understanding economies (because materialism and political economy) and even that’s a stretch

Yes, I would

Because as a socialist, I do know what the levers of society do

As pointed out in that thread, “life support” has a double meaning

Life support e.g aboard a ship it is the combination of all systems responsible for maintaining a safe environment for the crew.

Life support e.g someone in bad/critical condition being kept alive through medical equipment.

OP does not realize the second meaning is just a huge self-own as it is an admission modern capitalism is only barely keeping everyone alive instead of creating wealth and prosperity for all.

It is even worse when you realize wait a minute that is actually a very good analogy, capitalism is definitely the only reason why we have billions of people that can barely afford to live and many more ultimately fail and the “life support” system just stops working for them i.e you end up homeless, get murdered, die of hunger etc…

This is so true. Marx never considered how capitalism works

Capitalists: would you enter the infant ward of a hospital and start stealing food from the babies? Unplugging IV drips and hiding formula until they paid you money? Turning off incubators and demanding rent from a 2 week old?

Of course you would you fucking pigs, because you’re greedy and don’t care about human life.

Socialist countries, famously not training or incorporating doctors, scientists, engineers, mathematicians, or economists, much like Cuba, the USSR, and China

I do high level logistics shit all the time for a major supply chain but go off king