• RatzChatsubo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    We only pirate TV because it’s easier and cheaper. If you actually had a catch all service (like old Netflix) for a low price, people would stop. Oh wait, we had that but greed got in the way again…

    I used to be perfectly happy with Netflix and Google music + YouTube Red, but corporations were too greedy

    I now use a mix of free Kodi TV, patched YouTube apps, rip music off tidal, and self host media on a lifetime premium Plex server.

    • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They don’t care. They don’t want to innovate, they want to force you to pay them for nothing in return.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It is impossible to ban piracy. The whole concept is that it’s not legal to begin with.

    I bet Lars Ulrich is so proud that he killed music piracy back when he killed napster.

    Except wait…no he didn’t he killed A service. Meaning singular. The concept of piracy moved on. We got limewire and torrents.

    The ONLY thing that has slowed (if not stopped) music piracy is making the content readily and easily available in a convienent consumption method at a reasonable price.

    Shocking, I know.

    The invention of iTunes CHARGING money for music in a (at the time) new more convienent method of music consumption at a reasonable price did leaps and bounds more to destroy piracy than Napsters downfall ever could.

    Now if only video services would learn this lession. Because it’s the same lession. I don’t know how they missed the memo on this.

    Put your video in one centralized place. Make it hassle free to watch. Charge a reasonable price. Piracy dies overnight.

    And just to prove it, show of hands. Who here would go through the effort and risk of pirating, if Netflix had everything you wanted to watch, for $5 a month? Who here would say no, and still pirate? Reply below and tell me if you would still pirate with those conditions?

    But instead, netflix is pushing $20 a month, and the video hosting is fractured among multiple hosts, all of which overcharge, AND want to serve ads.

    Oh hey, right on cue. It’s a skull and bones flag approaching.

    • Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yep exactly.

      They’ve pushed 6+ services now so it cost that cable used to so people are unsubbing and “cutting the cord” again

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I would still pirate. I like to have the files instead of proprietary apps

      • Eyedust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Same tbh. I like having a hard data copy of the things I enjoy, and have pride in my offline music library, which has been neatly filed with all the proper metadata tagged on. Now I can boot up Audacious (Linux) or MusicBee (Windows) and pick the genre I’m feeling that day. Or I can go out for a walk with one of the iPods I’ve restored and leave my phone at home.

    • __init__@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Just a subscription that had most of the things and wasn’t a straight up abusive experience would be worth a hell of a lot more than $5. Too bad it will never happen.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I gind it kind of ironic that if the streaming services were federated and your subscription applied proportionally to the services where you watched different shows this problem would solve itself

    • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I would pay for the sub, but still seed for my friends in poorer countries where $5 USD is a hell of a lot of money.

  • Hal-5700X@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Make something people want to buy. That will help more.

    EDIT On the anime and manga. Quite a few Japanese companies don’t or refuse to officially release stuff in the west. Most of the ones who do, get fucked with by bad localizers.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s crazy that Netflix originally knew this back in the 2010s. Somehow, over the years, they managed to forget this little nugget of wisdom.

  • Majorllama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah because pirates are notorious for giving up immediately when you make their jobs a little harder.

  • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sounds like their strategy is to force US companies to block access to piracy sites.

    I already run my torrent client through a non-US VPN so this can literally be bypassed by adding this to my prowlarr docker compose:

    network_mode: service:gluetun

      • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        gluetun works with any openvpn provider. i prefer proton as ive already got a ton of mail services through them… the vpn is basically a freebie.

      • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I don’t really have a recommendation atm, I used to use mullvad but for torrenting I feel like the lack of port forwarding (once they removed that feature) was hurting my ability to seed so I switched to proton. I also recently added Usenet into my mix and since many providers bundle a VPN subscription - and mine in particular supposedly also supports port forwarding (usenetdirect bundles a ghost path VPN subscription), I’m gonna try to get it to work with that so I don’t have to pay for a VPN separately but I haven’t tried it yet.

    • naticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Thank you, I’ve been using my own docker image that adds in the PIA scripts and creates a Dante SOCKS5 server which works decently but I’d like something a bit more provider agnostic in case I want to change.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Been sailing the seas since 98. No intention of stopping. One thing I can promise is that you can’t stop it.

    Pirates always…uh…find a way.

    In fact, when streaming services came out and were super affordable, it actually became a bit harder to find pirated movies/shows because people actually opted for the legal option. If the government wants to pull this garbage, it’ll just bring many back into the fold and make it easier for me to sail the seas.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I started using pirated software in 1990, back when my first PC was gifted to me. All software I had was copied because I could not afford jack shit on my own. It is thanks to pirated (and open source) software that I have the career I have, and can afford to spend thousands of dollars on legitimate software, music, movies, books, etc.

    Provide product people want and prices they can afford, and they’ll buy them rather than pirate them. Don’t persecute consumers of pirated products and most of them will eventually purchase legally.

    • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s like Gabe said (paraphrased): “Piracy is a service problem, not a pricing problem.”

      Make it easy to buy stuff and people will. But the more barriers you put up, the more people will pirate. Granted, there are persons like you (and I counted among those at one point) who cannot afford things from time-to-time, but we’re a minority. Every game I’ve ever pirated from those days I have made sure to purchase once I was able to.

      Make it available for easy purchase and people will buy it.

      • Tregetour@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Make it easy to buy stuff and people will.

        In case you haven’t worked it out by now, the following advice may be of help:

        They’re not gonna do that

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It might. If it causes undue burden on ISPs or services like Cloudflare, for example, the law will probably be scrapped by some part of Congress or a judge.

      And even if it somehow survives all of that, a VPN with a server in another country will make this bill pointless.

    • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The current administration is seemingly trying to kill the very concept of free speech and expression.

  • IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This is a huge deal.

    More people should be fighting this.

    Giving this much power to corporations isn’t right.

    If all else, copyright owners of any media should have the same power so they can effective end AI from stealing their content.

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I imagine it’s possible but it sounds like they’re going after low hanging fruit like streaming sites and it also states that they can’t prevent people from using VPNs to get around the blocking.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Good luck, especially if they try to ban people from ripping their CDs to FLAC as well, like, how would you even find out if someone is doing that, for instance?

    Unless you somehow force a backdoor into rippers like Exact Audio Copy, CUERipper, or Whipper, the latter two being OSS, you can’t.

    Even SCMS never phoned home to anyone simply because the capability to do that didn’t exist yet when that copy protection scheme was first implemented, and it only applied to dubbing a CD over to DAT, MD, or DCC over S/PDIF on consumer gear.