• Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah how about fucking books written by AI hsvs to label by fucking law. Sick of AI taking away the arts. My ex today was showing off a app that lets her create songs with AI. She played this song and had a singer everything was awesome wasn’t to bad. But when asked who the singer was she explained how she was. She wrote the song and let AI pick the singer she just fine tumed the music.

      At first I thought it was Chris Daughter because it sounded a lot like him. No doubt this app steals the vocals from somewhere.

      • Pup Biru
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        counterpoint (not that this makes it easier for artists) is that lowering the skillset needed for people to express and communicate what’s in their head has always led to more art and diverse perspectives being shared. it’s upsetting to artists that the skill they’ve spent their whole lives developing has less value now, but allowing more people to create is far from a bad thing in a lot of cases

        • UltraHamster64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It doesn’t “lower skillset needed to create”, that can be achieved by making lowcost/free but powerful tools to be widely available.

          What it does is lowering the bar on making something that’s pretending to be decent but in actuality don’t have time and effort put in it. Which means that the only thing it is going to led to is massive amounts of slop