In short:

A Queensland girl sustained significant burns when wind blew sparks onto a jumper purchased from Temu, which ignited “in a split second”.

Temu recalled the jumper for failing to meet mandatory safety standards.

What’s next?

CHOICE is calling for more proactive protections for Australian consumers, in line with international legislation.


“She can’t even watch a candle be lit now on her birthday cake; she screams. Fire scares her.”

The young girl spent eight weeks in hospital in Brisbane undergoing skin graft operations.

She faces another decade of skin grafts as her body grows.

The ACCC said Australian consumer legislation did not contain a “direct prohibition on the supply of unsafe products”.

Since 2005 CHOICE has been calling for the introduction of a general safety provision (GSP), which would legislate a requirement for suppliers to ensure their products were safe before they could be sold to consumers.

“Unfortunately, Australia’s product safety regime is reactive and it can take someone being seriously injured or killed for a product to be recalled,” Mr Kelly said.

“The current reactive, largely voluntary, approach to product safety is clearly not working.”

A 2017 review of Australian consumer law also recommended the introduction of a GSP, saying it would match other OECD countries, including the UK and Canada, which had responded to the proliferation of online shopping platforms.

  • TinyBreak
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    C’mon. Your ONE job as a parent is to protect your kid. At no point you went “hmmm, maybe this hoodie is too cheap for a reason?”

    • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      No. That is a fucked up way to look at this. It is a good thing that regulations exist which means I don’t have to be an electrical engineer, microbiologist, thin film chemist, soil scientist, hydrological engineer etc etc in order to avoid being hurt by shoddy products.

      People who skirt regulations and sell inferior goods are bad people and the blame lies with them. There are heaps of cheap things that won’t cause harm and people have sold expensive shit that fucking kill you (cosmetics is a hellscape). Your stance is one of the extreme privilege of living in a world made safe by hard workers trying to fix things after terrible crimes by awful people.

      • TinyBreak
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        3 days ago

        My stance is one of caution. If something seems to good to be true it usually is. You want to rely on protections of government enforcement and buy from overseas retailers that’s your right. Doesn’t make it smart though.

        Course TEMU are to blame here. But this has got real “the GPS told me to drive into the lake” energy to it. Gotta take SOME responsibility in your choices.

        Course the whole Kmart sheet recall is very different, thats an aussie retailer.

        • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Vendors selling to Australians in AUD must obey Australian standards. You take this for granted all the time when you e.g. buy an item off Amazon and it isn’t full of lead.

          If you install an application through an official channel, it treats you like any other retail store, it shows you AUD prices, and you pay in AUD without filling out any sort of import declaration etc it is entirely reasonable to expect them to be in compliance with Australian regulations. Whatever the legal reality is here (ianal).

          • TinyBreak
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            3 days ago

            right… case no ones ever been screwed by a a cheap shit internet retailer before. There are entire memes about wish crap.

            • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              This is goalpost moving, and you are being rude.

              Yes, people take a chance on cheap things and expect them to tear at the seams, crack after a year in the sun, or not work on delivery. They do not expect them to go up like flash paper. You know this, you are clever enough to recognise the difference.

              • TinyBreak
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                3 days ago

                Man if you think this is rude wait till someone tells you your position is one of extreme privilege. But go on. Continue to take offense to other peoples shit parenting.

          • TinyBreak
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            3 days ago

            if it were retailing for within what kmart would sell it for I think you got a bit more right to be less concerned, sure. But its an online retailer, you’ve gotta protect yourself!

    • zero_gravitasOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Putting all else aside, the hoodie was given as a gift by the kid’s grandmother (see first paragraph), so the parent(s) probably didn’t know the price or the retailer.