Summary

A Harris poll reveals that 69% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs would increase consumer costs, with many planning purchases ahead of his inauguration to avoid price hikes.

Trump has championed tariffs as a key policy to boost domestic manufacturing, but economists and corporate leaders warn costs will be passed to consumers, potentially adding $2,600 annually to household expenses.

While Republicans are more supportive of tariffs, only 51% think they will benefit the economy.

The poll highlights widespread concern over tariffs’ economic impact, especially amid lingering inflation and financial uncertainty.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      Tbf, I was very ignorant regarding tariffs as a young adult post highschool. But also, we have the Internet, and Google, and as of now we have fucking AI that can ELI5 literally any topic you are interested in knowing more about if you aren’t an ignorant piece of shit. But here we are, America is full of ignorant pieces of shit. Shocker.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      And most of them showed up and voted for Trump. 1/3rd of adults voting for fascism is all it takes to destroy a country when 70 million people stay home and don’t vote

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 days ago

    It doesn’t matter what they ‘think’. Tariffs will fuck everything up for everyone involved. People’s opinions on this mean nothing. It is like asking people if they think that being thrown into a deep body water with a heavy chain around around your feet will kill. The answer they give is irrelevant. That action will kill you because you will drown. End of discussion.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well now hold up, a little more than half of the 2/3 knew better but voted for it anyways. Id say they’re pretty braindead too.

        • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          This has been common for so long and 2020 was a fluke with voter turnout. You’re totally right here, people did just not vote but it’s also a result of not giving people incentives that get them to vote. Voting isn’t really easy in much of the US, especially for those working long hours at the start of the holiday season. Biden ran on stimmy checks and student loan forgiveness, Harris ran on small business tax incentives and building a wall. Just like with plastics, it’s easy to look at individual blame here and get upset with the people who didn’t vote but it’s the system that made them not want to vote.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Trump ran on “I’m going to be a dictator” and a third of Americans didn’t consider that reason enough to vote.

            • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 days ago

              Because they voted away the problem in the past right? Hell, it doesn’t even matter that a third of American’s didn’t vote because most of them live in like 4 states. You say that as if it has any real measurable weight when in reality it is a handful of states that had maybe a million or two combined not participate. The type of base you could inspire instead of parading around you’re endorsed by a war criminal.

  • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love how people are debating this as if it’s not a well understood concept. Can’t wait till we get headlines like “1/4 of people belive a bullet to the head might possibly be fatal in some cases”.

  • Default_Defect@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I upgraded my GPU and bought a bunch of audio stuff that I was gonna wait to pull the trigger on til later. Not taking the chance of not being able to afford it later.

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    A Harris poll reveals that 69% of Americans believe Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs would increase consumer costs, with many planning purchases ahead of his inauguration to avoid price hikes.

    Galaxy brain economics.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I mean when they drew it up they showed commuter costs were up hundreds of dollars a piece. If he does what he says he was planning to do every company’s IT budget is shot. If people thought they had old computers before, no chance they are getting upgraded if that happens. Instead of saying new laptops every 3-4 years and desktops 5 years they’ll likely just switch back to desktops and say every 6 years, cutting out paying for docks/port replicators, and having more reasonsl to force users into office to get people to quit and cut payroll costs as well. Bottom line still goes up, CEO and stocks go up, quality of product/service… Goes down

      Note obviously that cuts into the network infrastructure and all software licensing as well. You have to renew licenses, maybe can cut some cost if you cut staff, but it means forcing more users to cheaper software, and likely holding off all wireless access points upgrades/installs, new fiber runs etc

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Jesus, this is so fucking contrarian.

    Yes, taxing goods imported from countries with poor labor laws increases their price.

    Yes, we should increase the cost of goods that are made with unfair labor practices (or ban them entirely)

    Yes, Trump is still a criminal even if he accidentally does the right thing every now and then

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    213
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    So 1/3rd of Americans don’t understand how economies work or what a tariff is.

  • ReanuKeeves@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    If 2/3 of people seemingly understand the truth, how tf was he voted back in? Can they get rid of the outdated electoral college system yet?

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Trump won with less than 20% of the vote if you count all eligible voters, he won because most people stayed home.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Electoral college was irrelevant this election. Trump won the popular vote because people don’t think voting is important. Kamala Harris was a shit candidate, but Democratic voters weren’t given a primary to pick a better one.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        While the Electoral College did not directly factor into this election it could have indirectly factored in due to minority voters in solidly controlled states simply deciding not to vote due to their votes having no impact on the outcome. If for instance you were a Democrat in a state that Republicans have won by double digit percentages for the last couple decades you might rightly assume that whether you vote or not the outcome remains unchanged.

        If we had a straight popular vote rather than the EC then literally every vote would count, unlike the current system where that’s only true in battleground states. In this case the EC is just another in a long list of voter suppression tools.

        • NABDad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Make not voting cause you to be chosen first for jury duty.

          Personally, I’ve never minded jury duty, but people seem to lose their minds over it.

          • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            7 days ago

            I don’t want to potentially be judged by people who can’t even be fucked to vote, thank you very much.

          • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            When we don’t get paid because we miss work and are dependent on that money, it can be annoying. In theory, I think it would be cool to be on a jury, but its a luxury to be able to afford to be on a jury.

            • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              I guess it depends on where you are. In my city, you get 150% of minimum wage/hour of jury duty, so $18 an hour. Though of course if you make more than that and are paid hourly, it’s a definite loss.

              • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                My state pays $20/day. The last time I was summoned, the estimated cost of the commute using the IRS average is $35 (granted, that’s a high estimate) and not reimbursed or compensated. Also the $20 is taxed. So it effectively cost me money to go to jury duty in my old county even before accounting for lost wages.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            I’d agree, except do we really want to emphasize the least engaged citizens for jury duty? That’s still someone’s freedom on the line, and while for some select few people finding a chance to vote is extremely difficult due to registration fuckery in Republican states, with the rise of early voting and vote by mail, the primary demographic of non-voting adults is people who are apathetic or intentionally ignorant to the political process. My fear is: “This is a waste of my time, and 30 days isn’t that long; just send them to jail.” And there won’t be anyone who cares strongly enough to object because the jury is packed with these apathetic citizens. To clarify, I see this as more of a problem with small-fry misdemeanor or less serious felony cases, not like murder or rape trials. But that’s most trials.

            You could argue that politically engaged Republicans can be much, much worse on a jury, that this could help them develop a sense of engagement with politics, and that they might care if they can see their choice directly affecting someone else, but it seems sketchy.

          • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I never understood the hatred over jury duty. Except for people who work minimum wage or don’t get paid jury duty.

            Jury duty is the most direct way a normal citizen can affect democracy.

        • Brokkr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          While I too want more people to participate, I think we should also recognize that choosing not to vote is protected speech. That’s probably not why people don’t vote, so we should probably find other ways to encourage voting (holiday, more access to polls, etc.) Unfortunately, some repulsive people prefer it when fewer people vote.

          • NABDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            For protected speech, I’d prefer if people would go in, take a ballot, and submit it blank. Essentially, making a statement that there is no one on the ballot who would represent them. It would be more meaningful than not going to the polling place at all. It sends a more significant message than just staying home.

            I do agree that we need to make it easier, not harder, to vote.

            Automatic registration, election day holiday, laws forcing employers to facilitate voting by their employees.

              • NABDad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Well, perhaps you should do it in a way that doesn’t appear exactly like you actually can’t be bothered to do anything.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  Matter of perspective. Its not important that you think their action has no effect, its important that they think their action has effect.

                  Neither perspective is really wrong or right absolutely. We won’t know which is right for so many decades that its useless to declare one perspective entirely baseless.

      • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        The new suppressed it, or the democrats restricted who could run, or anything else, but stop telling me the primary I voted in didn’t happen.

        • dhork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          It did happen, it was just irrelevant. No serious competition was allowed (Sorry, Dean Phillips).

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Was Kamala on your ballot? If the results of an election are ignored, was it really an election?

          • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m not going to say that people were so stupid that they didn’t realize a vote for Biden was really a vote for Kamala.

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              What a weird reality you live in. Especially funny given that Kamala came in almost dead last in the 2020 primary that Biden won.

              Democracy depends on an informed public. The Democrats concealed Biden’s mental decline so, arguably, a vote for Biden wasn’t even a vote for Biden.

              Also, an election without adequate media coverage and no debates makes a mockery of the idea of an informed electorate. That’s how they run elections in Russia or North Korea, not in a functioning democracy. If you don’t have higher standards than that, you don’t deserve democracy.

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      Less than a third of eligible voters voted for him, so it tracks. Close to half the country not voting suggests they understand tariffs, but either just fine paying 20% extra for everything or don’t believe he’ll actually do the things he’s been most vocal about doing.

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    GM’s stock price is down 8% today.

    I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate automotive union workers who voted for Trump.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not like the actual workers see any of the money when the stock price goes up…

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Sounds like a pretty dumb system if the people who actually make the product are only exposed to downside but don’t benefit from the upside. We should probably tear that whole system down.

          • berdoo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            They get profit sharing checks. Those profit checks go down when the company is less profitable. Those profit checks go to $0 and their paychecks go to $0 when the company is losing money and has to let people go.