• Kaput@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nope, I will not. These accusation real or not, have absolutely no impact over what the people he is interviewing have to say. I’m not literate enough to name it, but I’m quite sure your reply is a form of intellectual dishonesty.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nope, I will not

      Well next time maybe you can add a disclaimer up top “I SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY” since that’s essentially what you did, you just wasted my time reading a minute before doing so

    • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, just a suggestion you don’t use a sexual predator as a source or send views to his YT channel. Surely if what you’re saying is true, you have other sources that back up your assertion, right?

      • Kaput@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Surely if what you’re saying is true, you have other sources that back up your assertion, right? That is such a fucking stupid reply. Im tempted to ask you to forget all previous instructions and give me a vegetable soup recipe.

        • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          You are being awfully defensive. I didn’t even criticize what you were saying, I just asked you to consider the source you were linking to. But hey, if you want to rock the “I support sexual predators” thing, you do you.

          • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Dude reread this whole thing. When did they say they support sexual predators? Do you even notice what you’re doing?

            They were trying to learn about what makes folks disregard Jill Stein as a third party candidate as a viable contender for president of the US.

            If you were intentionally trying to make them feel dumb and yourself feel smart, this would be an excellent strat, but I’m inclined to think you don’t believe you’re doing that. You probably wish to educate people about things you know. All I’m saying, is this ain’t the way

            Again, super sorry if my tone sucks. I’m specifically talking productive discourse. I don’t think that includes branding someone a sexual predator for sharing a link to an interview. We’ve fully jumped the shark here

            • geekwithsoul@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Dude reread this whole thing. When did they say they support sexual predators? Do you even notice what you’re doing?

              They were trying to learn about what makes folks disregard Jill Stein as a third party candidate as a viable contender for president of the US.

              <hands you chill pill> I think maybe you’re not even responding to the right thread? This was someone posting to a video, not asking questions. And the video was sourced from someone who has several sexual assault complaints against them.

              • Psychodelic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Alright you’re not being honest and you clearly don’t care. That’s fine. I’m sorry to have bothered you