• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I think we should be working to organize the anti-genocide caucus of Democrats away from the Party and form a revolutionary party that can challenge the two right-wing parties for power. I think we can do this within the unions too, the rank and file are much more radical on this issue than the leadership. There’s a huge political movement right under our feet.

    • kescusay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Ah, so just divide the Democrats up to destroy their power. Typical.

      I know I’m not going to convince you, so this is for everyone else reading this thread. Because of our shitty electoral college and FPTP system, calls for third parties on the left translate into more political power for the right. Here’s how it works…

      Let’s say you have two main political parties, the Snuggling Puppies party and the Kicking Puppies party. The Snugglers usually win, because the Kickers are violent weirdos.

      Then the Kickers get the bright idea of helping out fringe parties that also love puppies, like one called the Worshipping Puppies party, which takes their love of puppies to the extreme. They secretly fund and promote these other parties, and it’s very effective. In the next election, it’s so effective that the Kickers win.

      Wait, what? How? It’s simple. With the people who love puppies dividing their votes between multiple candidates who love puppies, the Kickers get a plurality.

      Let’s keep it simple and say the Kickers clandestinely supported three parties that are ideologically opposed to them, meaning people who love puppies divided their votes up four ways. Each of the puppy-loving parties gets 19.5% of the vote, for a pro-puppy total of 78%! But the Kickers didn’t divide up their vote, so with a 22% plurality, the winner is… The party that everyone else hates!

      It’s a classic divide and conquer strategy. It only works when astroturfers manage to convince people on the left puppy lovers to divide themselves up, rather than consolidate to fight back against the right people who hate puppies.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Cute story.

        My goal is to destroy and replace the Democratic Party. If there can only be two parties then let’s build a revolutionary party and replace the useless liberal party.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 hours ago

          My goal is to destroy and replace the Democratic Party

          With what? I doubt even 15% of the voting public agree with any of your ideas.

          If there can only be two parties then let’s build a revolutionary party and replace the useless liberal party.

          In what world does destroying the further left, liberal party do anything except create a power vacuum for the right to fill?

          This is why nobody takes you seriously, you don’t even have thought out plans, just “burn it all down and magically good people who agree with me will rise up and seize power” You’re delusional and completely disconnected from reality, go read more theory and let the adults handle things.

        • kescusay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Cute story.

          True story. If you dispute it, you dispute math. It’s literally how FPTP voting works.

          Your goal is a permanent Republican majority. Might as well start openly rooting for Trump.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      None of that is incompatible or inconsistent with a Harris victory. If this is your expressed goal and desired outcome, it is MUCH easier to do under Harris than under Trump where any action you take is more or less guaranteed to be met with responses from any number of empowered supremacist groups.

      Also, I only EVER hear these revolutionary ideas and pushes during the last 6 months before an election when people proudly virtue signal about their intent not to vote for the Democrat. Just like with third parties, where is all of this political will and activity during the off-years when there’s time to actually BUILD a grassroots movement?

      I’m with you. Our choices suck. The time to start doing something about that is November 6th, after the election is won and a backslide has been prevented. Build out a movement and come back in 2024 with a platform, a base, and a candidate.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The person you’re arguing with has admitted that they want to destroy the Democratic party elsewhere in this thread, with the bizarrely naive belief that somehow this wouldn’t result in permanent Republican control.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Under a Democratic president everyone just stays home and hopes things get better. It was only under Trump that we had the largest protest movement in US history.

        And this is despite the fact that police killings have only gotten worse under Biden. I need to be clear, I am not an accelerationist. Conditions get worse no matter who the president is, but it’s only when liberals are out of power that they can be convinced towards revolutionary goals.