• nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      He literally did though. Do people forget that? It’s not like he asked the trumpanzee court to pull an uno reverse on him.

      • FlakesBongler [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        111
        ·
        10 months ago

        The Biden administration has multiple avenues to tackle student loan debt and they purposefully chose the one with the greatest chance of failure

        They also chose not to try and pack the court with friendly judges or even find an avenue that could bypass the supreme court entirely

        They’re also completely done with actually trying anything to actually live up to the initial promises they’ve made

        It’s literally Flanders’ parents, but without the excuse of them being freaky beatniks

            • nxdefiant@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Oh I know all about all of those things, and they’re valid things, everyone just seems to forget that this all started because Biden decided to take action to begin with. All the criticism is valid, I see no reason to omit any facts.

              The administration chose the easy way first. (I don’t see why they wouldn’t have to be honest.) They have totally dropped the ball on keeping it a priority.

              And if you read my comment, there’s no opinions in it. Just a question sandwiched between two facts.

              • MemesAreTheory [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                See, there’s where we differ. You think they chose the “easy” option. This seems to imply some kind of desire to actually accomplish what they set out to do. We think they chose the option they knew would fail so they would have an excuse for not doing anything, which is what they wanted all along. The Democrats have a long history of weaseling their way out of anything remotely progressive. They’re goddamn experts at using the system to accomplish nothing, only to then fundraise on it forever.

                This one will join the dustbin of dead leftish policies, like a “Public Option,” Increased minimum wage, and codifying Roe v Wade.

      • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        55
        ·
        10 months ago

        He did? Oh nice, that’s why I’m still making payments on my student loans then huh. Thanks Biden real useful. Thanks for doing it in a way that was always going to get challenged by, and struck down by, the supreme court. I know you had many other methods you could have tried, but I’m glad you chose the one that would never actually happen. Super useful, really feeling like that promise has been kept.

        By the way Biden still owes me $600 from his promise of “$1200 checks out the door immediately.” Still waiting! I’m sure that’s another promise that will be kept any day now. That’s fine though, it’s better to try one tiny thing that was never going to work and pretend like that means you did it rather than to actually fight for something. That’s what we vote for, one piddly little attempt.

        Oh by the way I think you dropped this PIGPOOPBALLS

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        10 months ago

        Biden: “There’s literally nothing I can do. I have to garnish your wages if you don’t pay the debts I cancelled. Its entirely in the hands of the bureaucrats and judges I appointed. Sorry kid! But I will expect your vote in November.”

      • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        10 months ago

        He could have tried to pack the court and made them stop him, you know, act like he was putting in the effort.

        Why are we even so concerned about the fucking court, they barely have anyone with guns who answers to them, send in the troops and do something good with them for once.

        • ElHexo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          10 months ago

          If the justices do strike down the proposal, McCollum says the administration’s best alternative would be to look to the Higher Education Act (HEA). This 1965 law allows student loan relief for certain groups of borrowers, including those whose institutions have since closed.

          McCollum points out that, under section 432(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1082(a), the Secretary is given the authority to modify, “… compromise, waive, or release any right, title, claim, lien, or demand, however acquired, including any equity or any right of redemption.”

    • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Blame the supreme Court and the assholes that brought the challenge to the supreme Court.

      • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        67
        ·
        10 months ago

        Key members of the progressive caucus, moderate progressivss like Ro Khanna even, were calling on Biden to expand the court with liberals.

        Leftist voices, even socdem mags like Jacobin were calling for him to find alternative avenues.

        Biden could have canceled student loans if he’d wanted to. He chose not to.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Blame the supreme Court

        Hasn’t Biden been on the judiciary committee since the 80s? Didn’t he vote a bunch of the current bench out of committee rather than blocking them, like McConnell has done?

      • hexi [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        10 months ago

        The President when SCOTUS says don’t genocide native Americans: “John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it.”

        The President when the supreme Court says to keep students in debt-slavery: “Oh no, my hands are tied!”

        It’s the same good-cop-bad-cop theater that always placates libs. Meanwhile Trump publicly questioned the legitimacy of judges any time they didn’t demonstrate loyalty.

        The DNC doesn’t want to fix this, they want to make a show of looking like they tried, but we’re stopped by higher forces. Rule of law is sacrosanct when fucking over the working class.

      • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The challenge that was made possible because of the Democrats and the Biden admin’s intentional incompetence? They don’t want to forgive student debt anymore than the Republicans do. Democrats are are just in the unfortunate position of playing the good cop and having a voting base that wants stuff like student debt forgiveness.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    10 months ago

    Then: A promise to cancel the debt.

    Now: A proposal for slightly less odious repayment plans. The chuds are probably going to make sure it never happens.

    biden-troll Promises kept!

    • GenEcon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Not much to say except: you voted for a GOP majority in the House of Representatives. You have no one to blame but yourself.

      • pisstoria [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        10 months ago

        My bad. I should’ve dropped all of my classes and dedicated my entire waking life to motivating people to vote for Democrats in one of the most conservative parts of the country.

      • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Ahahaha you really think they voted for republicans? This is a communist website you dingus. We hate Biden because he’s just as bad as Trump.
        I’ve personally voted for biden 5 times, just because I wanted to get that dang Cheeto out - And I’m not even an American!

        Riddle me this: the president is a dem, but shit happening is somehow still not his fault

      • CTHlurker [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s wild that every failure by the Democratic Party is considered a failure of its voters. Didn’t Trump already do student loan forgiveness for certain Veterans, which proves that the President is in fact capable of removing student loans from people in a legal way? Also, Biden can, under already existing legal frameworks, litterally order drone strikes on american citizens, so I really fucking doubt that Biden is suddenly incapable of saying "I’m removing all student loans from borrowers by the power vested in me by virtue of the US Air Force.

      • mayo_cider [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I didn’t vote for anyone, I’m a monarchist

        USA should just admit it’s a failed experiment and accept king William III as it’s rightful ruler

      • poppy_apocalypse [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 months ago

        As if it makes a difference. We’ve had a D super majority in California for fucking years with little to show for it. I mean we have like the world’s fifth of sixth largest economy, the means to make life changing improvements in the material conditions for fucking millions of people, yet we can’t even get a working high speed rail system online, among many, many other things, including shit that is right on the Democratic Party platform. Universal health care? Go fuck yourself. Free community college? Go fuck yourself. Student debt forgiveness? Go fuck yourself.

      • puff [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Canceling student loan debt does not require a Dem majority in the House. Biden has the ability, right now, this very second, to cancel all of the debt. Let that sink in. Biden has the power to cancel the debt and hasn’t. I’ll say that one more time so it’s clear to you. Joe Biden can cancel all of the student loan debt today and won’t. Do you understand that? He can, and won’t.

  • I was listening to NPR today and some dipshit said it was a “Debt cancellation plan” then the idiot interviewer asked “But they still have to pay it all back right?” Dipshit said “Yes but with less interest so it’s still fulfilling Biden’s promise.”

    I literally fucking screamed in my car. I have almost been killed by some drivers before but THIS is what caused me to flip my shit. I was so mad that I didn’t even feel bad when someone gave me a glare.

      • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        10 months ago

        federal loans forgiven after 20 years of qualifying payments [and 10 years after qualifying public service] has been the “deal” since at least 2010. except the department of education and the loan servicers have completely shit the bed at actually tracking and forgiving them when someone submits all the correct paperwork up until, supposedly, this exact moment.

        • RonJonGuaido [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          i understand that, i was clarifying that the interviewee was being very stupid (especially given that this “forgiveness” has been part of the status quo).

  • MultigrainCerealista [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hey kids did you know that bankruptcy only lasts 7 years?

    If you’re under the age of 50 and you’re not exploiting this loophole for FREE MONEY FROM THE BANKS to pay off your student loans then you’re a sucker.

    1. Get a good enough credit score to get several high value credit cards.
    2. Stop spending your money and start directing your money to student loans (because they aren’t typically discharged under bankruptcy because the system is RIGGED against you)
    3. Pay off one card with another card. Let that balance balloon. Maybe even get some free flights from the points for a cheap holiday.
    4. At the age of 25-30 you’ve probably reached the point where the walls start closing in. Turn off your phone and file for bankruptcy.
    5. Once you achieve bankruptcy and you’ve hopefully paid off most of your student loans by directing your cash there and living off of credit cards, NOW IT’S EUROPE TIME BABY.
    6. After 7 years living in Spain, Greece, Berlin, or France you’ve grown as a person, you’ve probably learned a new language and a new appreciation for architecture and art, maybe you’ve also met the love of your life. Whatever who gives a fuck now your credit card debt is gone baby. You beat the system.
    • SootyChimney [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This sweet plan seems to include a lot of being approved for masses of credit and hoping you can pay off your un-write-offable loans (there are an upsetting number of ways debts can’t be written off). But if anyone can go bankrupt and fuck over their debtees, please do.

      • Some people can get more into debt than others this is true, but the key point is that you should load up on as much debt as possible because that’s fucking FREE MONEY all you have to do is not need any debt for 7 years.

        Do you want to join a commune? Rack up that debt first.

        Do you want to live in Europe? Rack up that debt first.

        Interested in being a writer? You’ll be poor as fuck anyway so rack up that debt first.

        firms are incredibly willing to extend personal debt so take advantage of the fact that you can declare bankruptcy and score yourself 50,000-500,000 in the form of personal debt the banks were wrong to offer you and declare bankruptcy it’s praxis and you can pay for a free holiday just do it.

  • Melonius [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The example on the Save website shows that if your payment doesn’t cover the interest, they’ll forgive the rest of the interest while your principal balance goes untouched. It’s so gross to see a payment do nothing to your outstanding balance.

    They really did miss the indentured servitude days of the colonial era and had to recreate it at home. Go to school and have your wage skimmed for 20-25 years.

  • Nightcastle [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Hey college grads, this debt is actually a great lesson in personal responsibility, bootstrapping and entrepreneurship. It is time to get creative. Have you considered dealing drugs?

    • nxdefiant@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Huh. I bet it would be a lot easier for the Executive branch to abolish “student loan default” as a thing that affects your credit score a lot easier than actually cancelling the debt. Then the banks wouldn’t have any recourse. I wonder if there’s any precedent for anything like that, like if the fed can just declare it and force Congress to try and pass a law to overturn it.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    In the UK you only repay when your income is over £480 a week, £2,083 a month or £25,000 a year. If your income is below this, you simply do not repay, ever.

    Does something like this not exist for american student loans? Am I right in assuming they just function like other loans?

    • RonJonGuaido [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      that’s more or less what Biden is doing here. before, on income based repayment, one could have negative amortization, where a kid’s principle would balloon/snowball if he couldn’t cover the accruing interest. that’s now been eliminated, and the effective income cap (for the income plan) has been/and will be substantially (imo) reduced.

      this is very good.

        • RonJonGuaido [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          An increase to 225pct of the federal poverty guideline, which I think should total out to something like $33000 for a single person w/ no dependents (or about the UK level, as I look up exchange rates). So you pay 5 or 10 pct (depending on undergrad or graduate loans) of the difference between your pre-tax income and 33000 (and thus, if you make 33000 or less, you pay nothing).

          But, again, the big thing is that interest will not accrue, even if your monthly IDR payments are less than the debt servicing payment. That wasn’t the case before. Back of the napkin math example, to illustrate: Say a kid had $240k in loans from four years to get a bachelors in the city (not unthinkable, if you’re at a private school and paying w/loans for tuition and cost of living). Let’s say unfortunately he can only get a barista job at $20/hr or AGI $40k out of school. With the improved IDR payment at 5pct of the difference of his income (40) and the guideline (33), his IDR required payments would be of $7000 * .05 = $350 yearly, or ~$30 / month. Pretty good. But (and my math might be off here, too conservative) the debt service payment on the total loan, at say 6pct, is going to be at least $15000 (or $1250/ month). So even if he only would need to pay ~$30 to avoid default, he still needs to pay an additional~$1200/ month (!) to avoid the principle of his loan increasing. Let’s say annually, he’s taxed for $6000, pays all his loan payments for $15000, pays $12000 for room/utilities, that leaves ~$600 a month for food, health insurance (though some may still be covered by parents insurance, I’m not quite sure on this) anything else you might want or need. This kid is getting royally fucked, he will not be paying down his loan at all, he will have no discretionary income. and while the new Biden regime is obviously not as good as it could be or should be, it eliminate this ghastly hypo.

  • adultswim_antifa [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    I said it years ago and I’ll say it again. They’re going to treat it like it’s a payroll tax they can cut and raise by pausing payments for the ecawnameeee.