• Alabaster_Mango@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    We had some winners in my city a few years ago.

    Here’s my favorite quote from that article:

    “The money is in the car,” Comrie insists. “Who’s the spender? Does a bicyclist go and buy sporting goods, or furniture, or clothing? Or are they just out for a ride?”

    Does this guy think cyclists are sitting naked in empty apartments wishing they had clothes and furniture? Luckily he did not win the election.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        OTOH it’s absolutely insane what new bicycles are costing these days - bikes can be money pits too. I bought my road bike 12 years ago for about $1800 and was kicking myself for years for spending that much. A modern road bike (with disc brakes, wi-fi controlled electronic shifters etc.) would be in the neighborhood of ten grand, more than my car cost. Meanwhile my favorite bike is the 25yo hybrid that I bought on Craigslist for $100.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why would you ever want wifi controlled shifters‽ Maybe (ok definitely) I’m pilled on the whole anarchist bicycle repair scene, but I’ve got some decent trigger shifters that were like $30 and aside from the pain of calibration they’re great.

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            I was talking to a guy with an $8K bike the other day and he was proud of the fact that he could calibrate his shifters with his phone.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              On one hand if it’s automatic it might be nice, but on the other hand I’d rather just have a separate tool that does that so I can share it with friends and we can all have easy shifter calibration. But also I’d dread someone being able to hack my shifters or being unable to shift when I forget to plug it in. But on the other hand my bike has probably cost me like $200-250 over the three years I’ve had it so I’m definitely not the target audience

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        He did say the money was in the car, he just didn’t mean to imply that a car is a hole in the road that you throw money into.

    • thehatfox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 months ago

      The carbrained can’t see cycling as a form of transport, only as a type of exercise. In their minds people only cycle to cycle, not to fulfil other tasks. Only cars are for going places, like shopping.

    • yonder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why, the cyclist needs no clothes or food, for the cyclist is sub-human and is therefore an animal (what these car-brained people probably think)

    • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, “serious” cycling — a sport where a $1k bike barely qualifies as a bike, $5k gets you something rideable, and $10k gets you a pretty decent bike — is so anti-consumer!

      (I love cycling, and I’ll defend spending more on my power meter pedels than I would spend on a decent used bike. More bike lanes everywhere please!)

    • Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      US here with bonus points for a conservative city in the bible belt. I see people literally just driving in circles around the block or up and down the street endlessly almost every day. Multiple times a week at least. Don’t fucking tell me drivers only do so with purpose. eyeroll.gif

        • Ziglin (they/them)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It is exactly what some people I know do. If there’s a lot of car enthusiasts or bored teens old enough to drive in that area I can believe seeing that kind of thing. Although I do think it’s an exaggeration.

          • Facebones@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Although I do think its an exaggeration

            “Almost every day?” Maybe, depending, but not always. Which is why I fell back on multiple times a week which is depressingly not an exaggeration.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            Almost every day? Bullshit. Those people are driving somewhere for some purpose, this dude is just too stupid and hateful to realize it.

            • 211@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              3 months ago

              It’s not even limited to the US. In Finland it’s called “pilluralli”, “pussy-rally”, and the general associations are of 18-19-year-olds of lower socioeconomical class.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              You’re awfully angry over a passing internet comment and are trying to argue an absolute because of it. Perhaps you’re the stupid and hateful one here?

    • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah because someone who never exercises, you know the type of person who only moves around the city in a car, buys sporting goods frequently. Yep.

    • madjo@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They only think of cycling for sport and not cycling to a destination. That’s where the confusion lies.

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey now, they specifically added a ton of people to distract from his appearance, which was a kindness

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      THANK YOU.

      (Obviously this doesn’t matter. Language evolves. And no one cared about this rule until the last 200 years or so. But my parents drilled this particular correction so firmly into my brain that it bothers me when others get it wrong. “Fewer in number, less in amount.” Similarly, “farther in distance, further in degree.” And you stand on a PODIUM, you speak from behind a LECTERN.)

      (I might have some lexicographical trauma. 😅)

  • quoll@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    good news. car brained loser is sitting on 3.36%.

    well funded campaign (assume oxford st small biz tyrants and paddington geriatrics), posters everywhere.

    https://vtr.elections.nsw.gov.au/LG2401/sydney/mayoral

    i wish this would be seen as a vindication for active transport… but we all know the anti bike blow hards wont miss a beat.

    edit: big fucking lol. dont think they will get a single council seat.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      After reading the title and seeing the black abyss in the eyes of the great-value Voldemort wannabe, I was scared for a moment that someone who was so openly hostile towards the safety of cyclists could win an election. It brings me great relief to know that is not the case.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      well funded campaign (assume oxford st small biz tyrants and paddington geriatrics), posters everywhere.

      love the no bullshit analysis naming the supporters specifically…

      we should make politicians wear their sponsors on their suits like NASCAR drivers so folks know who they are allotting their tax money to lol

  • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Less bike lanes

    100% he’s going to make that happen

    and cheaper parking

    0% he’s going to make that happen

    Free market, bitches! Prices. Only. Go. Up!

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      If there are two bike lanes merging into one, there are one, two or three bike lanes?

            • chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Depends on if you’re using water to include types of water (if, like a maniacal madman, you have mixed Evian, Buxton and Harrogate mineral water into one jug). Then ‘i mixed fewer waters’ or ‘there are fewer waters in that glass’ would be valid.

              To be clear: I’m not the person you replied to, just someone who finds it quite interesting (in the same way that the plural fishes is valid if you’re talking about different species of fish).

              And yes, I know prescriptivism is bad, but also it is quite fun.

                • chumbalumber@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Eh, you wouldn’t use the noun water to refer to atoms of water. ‘How many waters are there?’ to refer to atoms of water is the statement of someone deranged

              • stoly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Those are homonyms. Water versus waters. The second one is metaphorical.

                I did enjoy your comment and you sound like you’ve had some linguistic training.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I believe there are about 55.508435 moles of H2O in a liter of water at sea level (basically assuming 1 liter of water = 1kg of water)

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Atoms of water are measured in moles. Atoms are discrete units, a mole is just a certain number of them

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              If there are two bike lanes merging into one, there are one, two or three bike lanes?

              Water isn’t countable but lanes are.

              What question are you answering?

    • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      They are indeed… Where did the whole “if two bike lanes converge” question come from??

      I was going to make the same joke.

      “Fewer. I mean more. More bike lanes.”

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    God please no, Sydney actually has viable public transport compared to something like the US.

    There’s so many cool JDM type stuff there probably because enthusiasts keep cars around the city.

    I’d much rather be able to see all the slick WRXs and Evos while walking than having to drive a crapbox into Sydney.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    I guess regardless of country, people pushing shit like this can’t seem to make a natural looking facial expression. Its like they try to replicate what happy people look like to them in order to get the response they see others receive but the best they can do is the trail leading into the uncanny valley

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    You need to carry a marker and draw devils horns whenever you see his poster. Colouring in the QR code to make it not work is a bonus too.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think devil horns would actually make him look less evil. It would distract from the deep void that hid behind his sunken black eyes and reptile smooth head, the void where his humanity and compassion for the safety of others had once been many decades ago.