A choice remark: “We’re now defending the fact that we’re in Aukus.

“If we weren’t in Aukus, we wouldn’t need to defend it. If we didn’t have an aggressive ally like the United States – aggressive to others in the region – there’d be nobody attacking Australia. We are better left alone than we are being ‘protected’ by an aggressive power like the United States.

“Australia is capable of defending itself.

“There’s no way another state can invade a country like Australia with an armada of ships without it all failing. I mean, Australia is quite capable of defending itself. We don’t need to be basically a pair of shoes hanging out of the Americans’ backside.”

  • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The big thing in all of this is why would China invade us? We’re a very big country a long way away from China, maintaining such a territory would be a logistical nightmare for the Chinese as they risk over-stretching themselves

    • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, I hated that example. Because its probably the least likely scenario in which we will use the Australian Military. As per our history shows.

      Thats why i used an example of a more limited operation to lop off the Pilbara in some resource control scenario. Its, I don’t know, less unlikely than the whole of Aus? Lol