• Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      So… Let me get this right. Your only response is literally a named fallacy?

      What does your gut say the stock market will do next month, oh wonderful and correct Oracle?

        • Count042@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Your response was irrelevant. It’s not even data. It’s a literal named fallacy.

          “Trump won once, so he will again” is literally the same statement.

          Take a critical thinking class, cause you really don’t know how.

          • UsernameHere@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Again, I’m pointing out that the predictions you’re using are inaccurate and changing candidates this late in the game would cause a clusterfuck so big it would be a guaranteed win for Trump.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              Referencing a time when an election turned out within the margin of error of polling isn’t really pointing out that the predictions are inaccurate. It’s pointing out that you don’t have the media literacy to interpret polling results.