• Bernie2028@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        An unnecessary comparison. I’m talking about 1 in 40 Chinese people facing hunger, this has absolutely nothing to do with America.

        • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          11 months ago

          It does because you’re claiming that the system that America is the best example of: letting the free market run food security, is superior to what China is doing. This is an incorrect statement as proven by statistics.

          • Bernie2028@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            It does because you’re claiming that the system that America is the best example of: letting the free market run food security

            Putting words in my mouth.

            Also you used a different metric from the metric I used. China and America have the exact same (2.5%) hunger rate using the same source. Typical Hexbear lying.

            • Zodiark [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Putting words in my mouth.

              You’re being facetious: How do you expect underpaid, overworked farmers to turn a profit and provide for their families if you’re making them grow a bunch of dirt cheap rice?

              There is no other way to interpret this comment other than demanding the farmer(s) sell the product of their choice at the market, favoring the individual over the collective here.

              China and America have the exact same (2.5%) hunger rate using the same source.

              Because the PRC is still a developing country, and their hunter rate was much worse in the past, that means (pretending your lies and misdirection are real) they are improving to close the gap and ensure food security.

              Again, all of your posts boil down to:

              wojak-nooo : NOOO YOU HAVE TO HATE CHINA!! SEESEEPEE BOTS NOOOO!! STOP GIVING ME COUNTERARGUMENTS!! NOOO!! HATE CHINA WITH ME!! NO!!!

    • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nah it’s pointing out how the approach you suggest (let the free market decide what’s profitable to grow for food security) is inferior to what China is doing.