• YuccaMan [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And did you at any point ask yourself why they own these things? Why Netflix the corporate entity owns media it did not produce while stiffing the people that did out of just compensation? Or how that information slightly complicates the otherwise simple nature of property and theft?

    The only mental gymnast here is you bud. The simple fact is, labor creates value, and Netflix has no part in that. I doubt they even put up any of their own capital in producing these shows.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why they own these things? Because they paid for it.

      How are Netflix stiffing people out of compensation? Netflix pays the rights holders for the right to stream the content.

      On your last part you could not be more wrong. Netflix spent over $6 billion in 2021 on original content. Content they created. They pay for the streaming rights to everything that’s on Netflix up front - in 2021 they paid $11 billion to the rights holders of the content in order to stream it on their platform.

      You’re trying to justify theft. You’re the one doing the mental gymnastics.

          • alcoholicorn [comrade/them, doe/deer]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Welp, you’re free to keep giving your hard-earned money to Disney’s shareholders to compensate them for the hard work of owning property and pay for the privilege of watching ads.

            Personally I don’t think I will.

            • Whirlybird
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can assume I give Disney money. You’d be wrong though.

              So you’re against any and all ownership of intellectual property?

              Do you also agree with the writers/actors strike by any chance? Because those 2 things don’t go together.

              • So you’re against any and all ownership of intellectual property?

                Only in cases where it benefits the working class and hurts the capitalist class. Laws aren’t a moral good, just a means to wield state power. Although under capitalism they’re written for the bourgeoisie, sometimes we can use their tools against them.

                Do you also agree with the writers/actors strike by any chance? Because those 2 things don’t go together.

                They do though. Every dollar I give to the studios is another dollar they can use to break the strike or build infrastructure to otherwise lower wages and raise profits.

                • Whirlybird
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Lol so basically you have no rhyme or reason for how IP laws should work other than “if they’re better off than me they shouldn’t have any ownership”. Yeh nah, this is pointless.