So you’re against any and all ownership of intellectual property?
Only in cases where it benefits the working class and hurts the capitalist class. Laws aren’t a moral good, just a means to wield state power. Although under capitalism they’re written for the bourgeoisie, sometimes we can use their tools against them.
Do you also agree with the writers/actors strike by any chance? Because those 2 things don’t go together.
They do though. Every dollar I give to the studios is another dollar they can use to break the strike or build infrastructure to otherwise lower wages and raise profits.
Lol so basically you have no rhyme or reason for how IP laws should work other than “if they’re better off than me they shouldn’t have any ownership”. Yeh nah, this is pointless.
You can assume I give Disney money. You’d be wrong though.
So you’re against any and all ownership of intellectual property?
Do you also agree with the writers/actors strike by any chance? Because those 2 things don’t go together.
Only in cases where it benefits the working class and hurts the capitalist class. Laws aren’t a moral good, just a means to wield state power. Although under capitalism they’re written for the bourgeoisie, sometimes we can use their tools against them.
They do though. Every dollar I give to the studios is another dollar they can use to break the strike or build infrastructure to otherwise lower wages and raise profits.
Lol so basically you have no rhyme or reason for how IP laws should work other than “if they’re better off than me they shouldn’t have any ownership”. Yeh nah, this is pointless.
It has nothing to do with being better off, it has to do with the relationship with the means of production.