• Marin_Rider
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get they are made for short durations but ventilation is all I can think of. not sure I’d want to be underground in that environment

    • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I reckon two people could spend five hours in that bunker with the ventilation shafts fully closed.

      But often you’d only be in there for an hour or so. It doesn’t take that long for the worst of a fire front to pass by… also it’s an absolute last resort. What you are supposed to do is evacuate and not be anywhere near the fire.

      Your body will naturally start breathing faster as CO2 builds up in the air. I wouldn’t expect that to start to be noticeable until long long after the fire has passed. But yeah, don’t sleep in it overnight (you won’t be able to, you’ll go into full on panic attack mode eventually).

      The real risk would be doing something stupid like starting a generator in the bunker. Those burn oxygen but don’t convert it to CO2, which means your body won’t recognise the danger and instead of panicking you’ll feel perfectly fine until you drift off to sleep, then die.

      Our body can’t detect a lack of oxygen, instead we detect too much CO2. Definitely want to understand that if you’re going to use an underground bunker.

      • Marin_Rider
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        5 hours is better than I thought, i can see as a last resort in that case it’s better than anywhere else you could shelter

      • TheHolm
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        CO2 absorbers is not a high tech thing. It can be useful additions.

    • tau
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the conditions in which you’re jumping into one of these you don’t really want much ventilation - too much heat/smoke, and potentially even the fire burning through some of the oxygen from the contained air. Underground might not be an ideal place to be but IMO it’s likely the best of a set of bad choices if you can’t get out ahead of time - dirt is a pretty good thermal insulator.

    • kowcop
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I reckon you would give it a go if it was ‘try it’ vs ‘burn to death’

    • PetulantBandicoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, what would a person do if something fell on top of the entrance? Running out of oxygen and trapped inside, sounds like a really warm coffin.

      • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Open the air vent, or the port hole (which is just a hole), or open the door a crack, and can spend about two weeks in the bunker as long as you have water with you (which you should).

        By then, hopefully someone has reported you missing and the rescue team will clear the fallen tree.

        • PetulantBandicoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, I was thinking about all the smoke in the air, but after some time the threat of smoke would go as the fire (at least should have) burnt passed to be safe to open vents.

      • Marin_Rider
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        agree. honestly it’s just not the sort of disaster that a bunker is suitable for

        • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sure - but it’s better than being above ground in conditions like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUs6iUpa4U4 - watch all the way to the end if you haven’t seen it, really scary stuff. Some of the firefighters evacuated on foot because it was so hot the fire truck started to melt while they were in it — it parts of it had melted when they came back to check the truck after the fire, there were puddles of metal on the road. There’s also footage from a go pro someone setup at their home before leaving, which shows even worse conditions.

          I used to live in a fire risk area - one of these bunkers would’ve been great peace of mind. Sometimes you just don’t know if it’s time to evacuate or not, and we were in a valley with only two roads out. When the weather is perfect for fires, there’s never just one fire in the area. Having both our evacuation routes blocked was a very real risk. Some people had homes in a big clearing wiht no tree