archive.is
archive.is

A photographer who provides images for pro-Palestinian groups has lost part of his ear and perforated an eardrum after being shot by police with a rubber bullet during a violent protest against a Melbourne military expo.

The 33-year-old photographer, who provides images for Free Palestine Melbourne and Free Palestine Coalition Naarm, was wounded at about 10am on Wednesday and says he is waiting to find out whether he will suffer permanent hearing loss.

Original URL: https://www.theage.com.au/politics/victoria/protest-photographer-loses-part-of-ear-after-being-shot-by-rubber-bullet-at-rally-20240913-p5kaex.html

    • eurekaEnglish
      101·
      3 months ago

      The problem is the disproportionate force. The police should not be using those weapons. If an officer panicking goes this badly, we shouldn’t be blaming that officer or the protest. The problem is that police were firing bullets into a protest, at all. That this was a plan they had on the table for this situation, and they’re clearly happy with this plan.

        • eurekaEnglish
          1·
          3 months ago

          You’re right, I didn’t mean to say they’re not at fault for shooting people. What I meant to say was that we shouldn’t get tunnel-vision either and assume that officers just need better training or vetting to make sure they don’t miss or don’t shoot as early.

      • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa
        1·
        3 months ago

        I don’t know, I feel like there was some unnecessary derision there.

        I like this place because we have discussions, sometimes weeks long, about the subjects, not the users.

        • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orgEnglish
          22·
          3 months ago

          Got it, saying protestors deserve to be targetted with indiscriminate chemical weapons = not being a dick. Pointing out that a particular user is calling for the sort of violence banned in the Geneva convention = being a dick.

          • Zagorath
            1·
            3 months ago

            saying protestors deserve to be targetted with indiscriminate chemical weapons

            Sorry, were we reading the same comment?

            • NaevaTheRat [she/her]@vegantheoryclub.orgEnglish
              2·
              3 months ago

              I dunno you tell me what the subtext of opening with defending the cops and denying that cops target media. Then goes into both-sidesism.

              And then wow look at what happens later:

              But to say we shouldn’t place any blame on individuals over-simplifies the problem. There are multiple issues at play here, I don’t think you can just wave away the personal responsibility of the individuals involved.

              Oh look it’s both sides are at fault again. If you’re filming at a protest, or even attending you have some personal responsibility for getting collaterally shot in the face or teargassed.

              This is nonsense, the violence is extremely asymmetrical and involves the use of indiscriminate weapons. I mean imagine if a protestor fired rubber bullets or teargas into a crowd to hit a shell or LM exec, what would anyone be saying about that person? He’s not presenting some nuanced critique, he’s gone straight into defending violence which would constitute literal war crimes if it wasn’t the police doing it.