I think the biggest thing here is the hazard ratio

As you say 1.0 is literally nothing. Most say anything below 2.0 shows random chance, and real signals are well over 10.0

I can’t be arsed looking up the paper, by chance was its data pulled from FFQ? Ah, I see you mentioned the Nurses study, so that’s a yes. Not just a FFQ, but the poster child for the low quality of FFQs

So all eggs are bad because the majority of eggs are bad. I guess logic is overrated. I guess that means that all water is salty because most water is ocean water.

What’s really fun is when they talk themselves into a corner

1. Confining or hurting an animal is bad
2. Letting someone hurt an animal is bad
3. Animals are someone
4. Predators exist
5. Can’t have that, kill all the animals to prevent animal suffering

I don’t think you’ll have many people disagree that cramped and caged egg farms are cruel

Backyard chickens have a pretty good life

Paddock raised chickens (where they are assessed by the animal protection agency) have a pretty good life (but they don’t get the insects and mice the backyard chooks get)

So how can you say eggs are bad based on some eggs being bad? Some bees are badly treated too, you know.

Anti-pica – complete nutrition

Thanks mate! (This is me on the PC, it defaults to lemm.ee where phone defaults to aussie.zone)