• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    The DMV had a problem because owners were exploiting a loophole to get these on the road even when they don’t meet safety standards.

    • David_Eight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are they banning imported cars in general or just k cars? People have been importing Nissan GTRs and other type of cars for years using that same loophole.

      • Anarchistcowboy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Exactly or I don’t know maybe they’d just try to ban all the 30+ year old cars and trucks that didn’t have modern safety features I can’t see how a 35 year old samba is more dangerous than a 35 year old s10.

        • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yea their whole argument is baseless. They’re essentially saying that they have pedestrian safety figured out and not the countries that have the most walkable cities? Wild.

      • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        That is a woefully incorrect correlation.

        For example, not that it was mentioned in the article, but lots of research and regulation go into hood design to minimize pedestrian injury in an unfortunate collision or reduce additional risks such as being pulled under the hood or exposed sharp point. Except the sharp edges, neither apply for motorcycles, but which have their own, unique safety requirements. And there could be hundreds of other examples I’m unaware of. That’s sort of why we have a government organization such as a DMV.

        • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          The DMV has zero bearing on vehicle safety. They’re only denying and trying to revoke legally issued registrations. So your makeshift argument is moot. You’re trying to say the registrable F150 is more pedestrian safe than a Daihatsu Hi-Jet………which is definitely not the case. It’s quite the opposite.

          Not to mention they’re making golf carts road legal which don’t even have seat belts or any other crash verified safety equipment.

          These reports have been around for years.

          • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m not saying a F150 is more or less safe than a Hi-Jet at all.

            I’m thinking like a bureaucrat and saying: if it complies with regulations, it can be registered.

            Results: ✅ F150 ❌ Kei truck

            • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              This isn’t really up for debate. It’s legal to import anything 25 years or older under Federal law. They don’t have to comply with regulations outside of maybe smog. And even then if you import anything 1974 and older you don’t even have to smog that in California.

              I could maybe see an argument where they shouldn’t be allowed on roads above 70mph since most kei cars aren’t capable of that, and those that are run such high rpm’s it’s just not practical.

        • David_Eight@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          As far as I’m aware the US doesn’t have any(or at least not many) pedestrian safety standards. That’s actually the reason the Cybertruck isn’t sold in Europe, it didn’t meet Euro pedestrian standards. I mean just look at the fucking thing, it’s all sharp edges and corners lol