- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
But why the decision to ban Kei trucks from Rhode Island streets? Because the DMV claims they don’t meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS).
You must log in or # to comment.
That snippit is out of context. The DMV claims they don’t meet FMVSS because they don’t.
… the DMV claims they don’t meet Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). And while it’s true Kei vehicles don’t meet those safety standards, they shouldn’t have to. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), imported vehicles at least 25 years old are exempt from FMVSS.
They are exploiting a loophole for personal antique vehicles to import or resell a fleet that doesn’t meet safety standards. It can become an issue and absolutely within scope of the DMV to keep an eye on.
Then the DMV better start cracking down on large trucks (F250, etc) as well. NHTSA “safety” standards have had all kinds of loopholes exempting large trucks and SUV from basic safety features including rollover protection, head restraint, and various impact protection systems.
Meanwhile motorcycle are still allowed.
Double standards.Motorcycles require additional certification before riding
Damn, I’d study and take the test for a Kei truck citation in a heartbeat
The driver is unprotected on a Motorcycle, the kei truck ban is … because it doesn’t protect enough the driver in case of crash.
If you put the motorcycles on the same standard than the cars, none but a few would be allowed.Get a clue about vehicle classes ya doughnut…lol
Very small cars have a max speed of 50 to 80 km/h, cannot drive on highway, often doesn’t need a driving license.
The kei truck have the size of this vehicule class.
Helmets are not required in Rhode Island
Weird safety standards.
They don’t care about pedestrians (see Cybertruck)?See any truck
The cyber truck is safe for pedestrians. Can’t hit a pedestrian if it never leaves the repair bay for recalls.
The EU takes pedestrians (and cyclists) in account for safety standards, the US doesn’t.
How do SUVs fit in that standard in EU?
You basically need to design the car so pedestrians bounce over the hood instead of going under. So you can still to an SUV, but can’t really do a Ford F150 style front.
But the F150/Ranger and esp. RAM Trucks exist here
The safety requirements this vehicle doesn’t meet could easily be regarding hood design; highly studied and regulated to minimize pedestrian injury such as sharp angles or being pulled under the hood.
I’m convinced the only thing lawsuits are waiting for is the accidents where they maim pedestrians. CT is a disaster for Tesla.
