• intelisense@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    2 months ago

    What if you are severely immuno-compromised during a pandemic? Just die, I suppose?

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      ·
      2 months ago

      Better that than to hurt the feelings of someone who cares a whole lot about people wearing masks.

      • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        From reading the article, I get the impression that this bill is mostly about them wanting to be able to arrest protesters who wear masks to hide their identity.

        Which is still really shitty, to be clear.

      • puppy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 months ago

        But here I thought Republicans only cared about facts, not feelings. . .

        • kescusay@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 months ago

          The Republican claim on hard-nosed, reality-based reasoning is just so astoundingly mendacious. I find myself legitimately perplexed over the whole thing.

          I mean, the guys who believe the Earth is 6,000 years old, trickle-down economics work, ectopic pregnancies are a gift from God and mustn’t be stopped, vaccines are poisonous, life doesn’t evolve, and Donald Trump was a good president are the down-to-Earth realists? Is this performance art of some kind?

          How do people like that survive to adulthood?

    • xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Or worse, what if you are a bit sick but need to go outside for a while? Just keep spreading the disease, I suppose?

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This would be a clear violation of ones first amendment right. Say it’s your religion.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The courts have already set the precedent that there are preferred religions and religions that do not enjoy the same rights because the judges don’t believe in them. Our legal system is corrupt and unjust. We cannot count on the courts to protect our rights.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh just call the TST for this one, even the constitutional literalists cant weasel their way out of that one.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 months ago

          They can, as they already have. There is no guarantee that their decisions will be consistent or intellectually sincere.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not…really? Not in this context, anyways.

        You cannot compel a person to remove their hijab, anywhere in the US, for example.

          • foggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Yes cops are bad. We all know. You don’t fight cops at your arrest for justice. You fight in the court.

            You’re missing the point entirely.

            • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Qualified immunity called me while you wrote this. It didn’t say anything, it was too busy laughing.

                • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Qualified immunity more or less means that the cops can’t be held directly liable for something that the courts haven’t yet found to be wrong for a police officer to do while in the course of their duties. So, if a cop does something obviously wrong and fucked up in the course of their duties (like, say, detaining you in a car parked on railroad tracks) and you suffer injuries from it, but a court hasn’t previously found that exact situation to be a wrong thing for a police officer to do, qualified immunity prevents them from being held personally accountable. The next person who gets detained on railroad tracks is covered, but you’re shit outta luck.

                  I know what QI is about, the comment has more to do with fighting the cops in court when courts meet all manner of egregious police behavior with little more than stern finger wags and exasperated sighs at best (often. Very rarely, they actually do get held accountable) and endorsement at worst.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You don’t win fights against cops in court. Best case scenario, the public pays the cost to cover your suit.

              But your point was that people have rights in the US. My point is a right on paper but at the discretion of the police, is in practice, not a right.

  • Marighost@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are active KKK chapters in NC. There is also a Proud Boys presence here (they’re known to wear masks).

    I wonder, will they be exempt from this? (I know the answer, of course. Republicans will protect their own.)

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      This was actually discussed. The bill makes an exception for “members of a secret society demonstrating in public” as long as they get a permit from the police first.

    • HWK_290@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      My exact thought: surely they’ll be prosecuted under this law, right? Right?

  • Dendr0@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    “For health reasons” - if that’s what they choose to enforce, well then… looks like every day just became Halloween.

    “No officer, Im not wearing this Ronald Reagan mask for my health, I’m celebrating Halloween” “Yes, officer, in May”.

  • shininghero@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes, shoot me for wearing an anti-allergy mask officer. I’m begging you.
    I will live like a king siphoning off your retirement pension if you shoot me for keeping pollen out of my nose.

    • GluWu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They will, they will make hundreds, maybe thousands of arrests knowing full well its unconstitutional. But it’ll take a year or two to work through courts at which point the courts will be completely controlled by Project 2025 magats.

      • NovaPrime@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Disagree. Even if this goes through, it reads more like a liability waiver: it’s power is more in the chilling effect vs. actual teeth in enforcement

  • 3volver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Banning masks is authoritarian fascist shit, especially masks that protect you from spreading contagious illnesses. Ridiculous, one year we’re all told we need to wear masks to protect one another, next year we’re told that it’s illegal? Fuck off government, fuck off.

    • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In one case it was experts trying to save lives. In the other it’s white nationalist christofascists virtue signaling to their crushingly ignorant base.

  • grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    Would this include airplanes flying into NC? Like, if I have a layover in Charlotte and I’m only gonna be at the airport a few hours, I can’t wear a mask on the plane to Charlotte, or at the Charlotte airport? I know planes are owned by the airlines so they’re not “public”, but what about inside an airport?

    • RandomStickman@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I can only speak from an international perspective but I’ve taken a plane from Canada through USA a few years ago. During that time Canada had a mask mandate so all of us have to keep our mask on from the airport all the way to boarding. However, once the cabin door closes, apparently, that’s when American law kicks in. The mask mandate is lifted according to US law. Maybe US state laws work similarly?

  • Shelbyeileen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let them try … I’m a cancer survivor with a compromised immune system. They can fuck right off and I’ll be filing an ADA complaint.

  • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ever since I left NC it has become the most fucked up bunch of deranged retards (oh, excuse me, deranged “mentally challenged” 🙄 ) and I am NOT going back to fix it. This is what nonstop, unchallenged radical fascist radio causes, and every shitlib here is still gonna defend it as “free speech”.