• treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 months ago

    Frustratingly vague for a Slashdot write-up.

    “These brothers allegedly committed a first-of-its-kind manipulation of the Ethereum blockchain by fraudulently gaining access to pending transactions, altering the movement of the electronic currency, and ultimately stealing $25 million in cryptocurrency from their victims,” said Special Agent in Charge Thomas Fattorusso of the IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) New York Field Office.

    Good to know the prosecutors have an understanding of what they’re prosecuting… Not even a single mention of MEV in the DoJ press release.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      by fraudulently gaining access to pending transactions

      That makes no sense to me. The mempool is public, everyone can see pending transactions.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because it’s not the public mempool. It’s a private MEV mempool that people pay to add their transactions to for special priority or conditional inclusion. For instance, asshole profiteers can use it to sandwich attack traders to siphon off “market inefficiencies” or some people just want immediate front of the line inclusion in the next block.

        Presumably they exploited something in this MEV system (completely unrelated to the Ethereum protocol) that allowed them to see the pool and they shouldn’t have. Wish I knew more but everything I read was incredibly vague and misleading.

    • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      What’s funny is that that’s a description of MEV.

      gaining access to pending transactions, altering the movement of the electronic currency, and ultimately stealing $25 million in cryptocurrency from their victim

      I skipped “fraudulent” because neither MEV bots nor this attack can be called fraudulent imo, although MEV is definitely taking value one didn’t help create.