• Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 months ago

    Halo wasn’t even all that great to be honest. It was popular because it was an accessible, easy to play FPS on a console during a time when those types of games were mostly played on PC.

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Mine personally is that all past Reach were garbage, I’ll never forgive what 4 did to the lore, humanity being around and a spacefaring race back when the forerunners were was fucking stupid

        • g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          What if I told you that 343 didn’t make that decision. Ever wonder why Guilty Spark called Master Chief reclaimer? Though I agree with your point, 4 was the last halo game I bought.

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            All of the lore snippets we got before 4 kind of hinted that Humanity was chosen as the next tech bearer because they were on the verge of a sentience level that the rings would exterminate, but not fully there yet, the fact that the forerunners would choose to pass the mantle on to a race they were actively at war with INSTEAD OF SAVING THEIR OWN RACE, is BEYOND stupid

        • ramirezmike@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          goldeneye 64 was pretty innovative even compared to its pc competition at the time. It suffered from performance issues, but the xbla remake or just good emulator settings fix that and really make it shine

    • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No way dude. it revitalized the fps genre which was circling the drain at the time, and some ideas Halo had are still felt in fps games today.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I disagree. Half Life was top dog back then with Counter Strike, and Unreal Tournament and Quake arena for the multiplayer arena fps genre.

        I found Halo’s level design pretty boring and repetitive. The story wasn’t appealing to me either. I didn’t like the American-like militarism aspect. Especially in that post-9/11 period.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Halo under Bungie was pretty damn good.

      They were unique for that OG Xbox era of consoles, and although there were a lot of great games on the PS2, the one thing they sorely lacked was a really good FPS. Timesplitters was close, but Halo was where FPS first felt designed for a controller. The level design was on point as well, things like The Silent Cartographer still hold up now. It wasn’t just a series of corridors.

      Other devs cracked it by the next gen, notably Infinity Ward, but back in that generation Halo stood alone.

    • CynicalStoic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Totally agree! I remember being shuttled to the demo XBox by a GameStop employee who was fawning over the first Halo and I was not impressed having just finished Half Life 2