• 0x0@programming.dev
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    You don’t think nearly 1/6th is statistically significant?

    For statistics’ sake? Yes.

    For the LLM bias? No.

    • SavedKriss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago
      1. It’s not an LLM, it’s a GAN and it’s inner workings are very different.

      2. If that 1/6th has the most positive feedback in recognizability, for the GAN it becomes a high weighted part of the standard. These model’s categorizing flow favors unique features of images.