• ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Some people seem way too okay with there being two bad choices for president.

    Others seem way too resistent to any attempt to make one of those choices not bad.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s a difference between being okay with something and begrudgingly working with circumstances while simultaneously criticizing people who give up because things aren’t perfect.

      I’m not okay with Biden being the best candidate, but that doesn’t make abstention a viable voting strategy.

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      The phrase “there are 3 bad choices for president” is true, but is so hilariously reductionist. I’m not saying you, in particular, are evaluating it through this lense, just that there is a difference between the “bad” here, and it’s really, really obvious.

      • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It is a reference to the two party system that constrains the election to what is often considered the picking the lesser of two evils.