It’s so rare to actually see a new battery tech exit the lab and enter production. Always seems like there’s 10,000 new up and coming breakthroughs in battery technology, but none ever leave the workbench.

While Na-ion batteries don’t have the energy density of Li-ion, they make up for it with many other factors such as more abundant source materials, increased safety, higher charge/discharge currents, and increased number of charge cycles.

Slashdot summary:

Not only is sodium somewhere between 500 to 1,000 times more abundant than lithium on the planet we call Earth, sourcing it doesn’t necessitate the same type of earth-scarring extraction. Even moving beyond the sodium vs lithium surname comparison, Natron says its sodium-ion batteries are made entirely from abundantly available commodity materials that also include aluminum, iron and manganese. Furthermore, the materials for Natron’s sodium-ion chemistry can be procured through a reliable US-based domestic supply chain free from geopolitical disruption. The same cannot be said for common lithium-ion materials like cobalt and nickel.

Sodium-ion tech has received heightened interest in recent years as a more reliable, potentially cheaper energy storage medium. While its energy density lags behind lithium-ion, advantages such as faster cycling, longer lifespan and safer, non-flammable end use have made sodium-ion an attractive alternative, especially for stationary uses like data center and EV charger backup storage. […] Natron says its batteries charge and discharge at rates 10 times faster than lithium-ion, a level of immediate charge/discharge capability that makes the batteries a prime contender for the ups and downs of backup power storage. Also helping in that use case is an estimated lifespan of 50,000 cycles.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    sourcing it doesn’t necessitate the same type of earth-scarring extraction.

    I guess they dont know how lithium is sourced.

    • Pup Biru
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      the problem with lithium ion isn’t the lithium; it’s the cobalt etc

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        cobalt’s not necessary, and the article is specifically talking about lithium sourcing.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s also the lithium, or at least it is how it’s done now. Big shallow ponds of water in regions that are already strapped for water.

        Several EVs are already cobalt-free.

        That said, California’s salton sea is a very promising source of lithium. It’s already an industrial waste zone, but one we can make use of now.

        • blazera@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          its big shallow ponds of saltwater. Folks just feel like lithium has to have a monkey’s paw catch to it, but it’s one of the least ecologically damaging material to extract from the earth.