• Icalasari@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    No it isn’t, but it does highlight the main issue:

    Communism would work if it weren’t for people trying to co-opt it for power

    Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism is the end goal (since, it being automated, means there should effectively be no way to hijack it), but we ain’t getting there for a long time. Let’s go for socialism first and work from there

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Communism would work if it weren’t for people trying to co-opt it for power

      As long as there exists a way to gain power over others, someone will do it. That’s just the reality of our nature, unfortunately.

        • ilost7489@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          This goes into a fight over philosophy of human nature. However, since the days of the Roman republic over 2000 years ago where capitalism wasn’t even a concept, people have used political systems to consolidate and gain power over others. It is undoubtabele that there will be people who try to co-opt the system for their personal gain

          • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Depends on Mode of Production. Roman society was still a class driven society.

          • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s just human nature unfortunately. We like to help one another and hate to see another human being suffering because we know that could be us. But capitalism has conditioned and limited us out of our human nature to help one another, because either there is no profit in helping the poor or destitute, or we lack the means to help.

            • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s such a wide eyed idealistic view of the world. Let’s all come together and sing kumbaya.

              All people throughout history have always tried to just help each other out, right?

              • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                Depends on the dominant Mode of Production, actually. People are shaped by their environment.

              • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                Its a realistic view of humanity, not a realistic view of the world we have allowed the greediest among us to create. You should read The Dawn of Everything A New History of Humanity, it goes extreme in depth to explain just how wrong your nihilistic view in humanity is, cooperation is the norm, what Capitalism has created is the anomaly.

              • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                People are products of the environment. These influence the ideas people have, who then shape their environment which in turn further influences the ideas people have.

                Being conditioned by the material conditions of Capitalism is the opposite of Idealism, it’s Materialism.