The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 3 months agoThe Associated Press "dehumanizes" the Frenchlemmy.worldimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1435arrow-down112
arrow-up1423arrow-down1imageThe Associated Press "dehumanizes" the Frenchlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Facepalm@lemmy.world · 3 months agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·3 months agoBoth versions have the same meaning to me. Sometimes I think we change things just to feel like we’re doing something.
minus-squarelunarul@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·3 months agoOf course it has the same meaning. The guide is about how to rephrase the same thing, not about changing what you write entirely.
minus-squareThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoI mean that one doesn’t sound “dehumanizing” to my ear, like the guide suggests.
minus-squarelunarul@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·3 months agoWording like “the poor” makes being poor an identity. While “people who are poor” identifies them as people first. It’s a subtle difference, but it has proven impact on general public perception of certain groups.
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·3 months agoOnly dehumanize people who deserve it, like the rich.
Both versions have the same meaning to me. Sometimes I think we change things just to feel like we’re doing something.
Of course it has the same meaning. The guide is about how to rephrase the same thing, not about changing what you write entirely.
I mean that one doesn’t sound “dehumanizing” to my ear, like the guide suggests.
Wording like “the poor” makes being poor an identity. While “people who are poor” identifies them as people first. It’s a subtle difference, but it has proven impact on general public perception of certain groups.
Only dehumanize people who deserve it, like the rich.