This would be amazing for anyone heading out to the bays or Wellington Airport, no intersections or lights to worry about, and it would make life so much easier for the CBD as well, not having so much through traffic in the CBD.

  • Obi@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Title makes it sound like they just found an unknown tunnel and are investigating what it’s doing there.

    • liv@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what I thought at first. I watched too much Wellington Paranormal.

  • Venator@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A tunnel that long would tale a similar amount of time and money as an underground metro… And have significantly less utility and economic benefits…

  • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Maybe it’d be good, but this just feels like the Boris Johnson method of:

    • announce some fantastical massive project that’ll never get built but will pull some headlines for a bit
    • funnel some public money to cronies for contracting services to do a business case
    • quietly shelve it until it’s time to pull out something else for the same effect.

    If they want to reduce traffic congestion, expand public transport and make it more reliable and cheaper.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      This is being explored as an alternative to a second Terrace and Mt Vic tunnels, and sounds like just an idea for now.

      We desperately need to improve access to that area though, getting out to Miramar, Seatoun and Titahi Bay is a nightmare at times, including on weekends.

      And public transport can only do so much, it’s not an option for everyone.

      • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s not an option because we neglect it to the point it’s not usable for a lot of trips.

        That doesn’t mean improvements aren’t possible, and they would help free up capacity on the existing road network. Roads are such a poor investment at this point, especially ones like these

        • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Can I use it for when I take my kayak out there? 5.5m long boat shouldn’t take up too much space in the bus, right?

          • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sorry, not sure how investing in more PT options would require you to take a kayak on the bus.

            • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s not what I asked you.

              I’m pointing out why I won’t be taking the bus if I’m heading out that way.

              • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                So then don’t, I didn’t say it must replace every single trip for it to have value

                • thevoyagekayaking@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  The whole point of my reply was pointing out why public transport isn’t an option for me, and why, no matter how good it gets, we will need to upgrade our road infrastructure eventually.

                  Absolutely nobody has said it won’t help.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s not an option because I have a van full of tools, not because of the quality of the service.

          I swear, people like you must think everyone in the country works in an office.

          Yes, we could certainly improve public transport in Wellington, but as I said, it’s simply not an option for many people.

          • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I know this is a hard concept to grasp, but there are people out there who are not yourself who, if the option is there, will leave their cars at home meaning the roads are less congested overall.

            • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 months ago

              I never said there weren’t. What I did say, using very small words, is that no matter how good public transport is, not everyone can use it.

              It’s a tough concept to grasp, it would seem.

              • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                What kind of an idiotic argument is “not everyone will use it”. Who was claiming that every single human being in the city would be using it?

              • Xcf456@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                And what I said was not everyone needs to use it to benefit from it because unlike just blowing billions on more roads, it reduces congestion overall instead of adding to it.

                Anyway on the tunnel, fantasy at best, Tory grift at worst, probably both

  • AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s an amazing idea, but the seismic implications are enough to discourage it, I’d have thought.

    How the heck does one build it with a straight face when we have so many quakes and have been expecting something major for decades?

    • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, we’ve got no shortage of tunnels in Wellington, many of which have been around for over a hundred years, and withstood many earthquakes already. Building a quake resilient tunnel can definitely be done.

      • AWOL_muppet@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So there’s 3 tunnels that we run vehicles through, day to day (that im aware of). Terrace tunnel, mt Vic and the bus tunnel. The city would struggle with either of them collapsing, and I understand the ones under mt Vic are already in dire straits, going by some of the points hopeful mayors that they were campaigning on. I’m no expert but your claim feels like a huge stretch.

        As for earthquakes, there’s one that was readily found via a search in 1855 and that “considerably reshaped the geography”, so, respectfully, I completely disagree. https://www.wcl.govt.nz/heritage/earthquakes.html

        edit sorry, I should have clarified earlier, it’s the major quakes I’m concerned about. Not the frequent little ones

  • InvisibleShoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lol From the sound of the headline, I thought someone had dug an unauthorized 4km tunnel and it had just been discovered. Was thinking WTF

  • BalpeenHammer@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let’s pretend this government is going to stay in power for thirty years.

    I predict this project wouldn’t be completed in their tenure if they approved it tomorrow. Look at how long it took them to bypass Cambridge on SH1 FFS.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Listening to The Kaka this morning, Bernard Hickey has a nice take, one primary reason is that this will save politicians approx 15min between the airport and parliament…the cynicism made me LOL