Was rather shocked to find BT hubs don’t allow you to change DNS servers anymore and force you to use their own ones, so I can’t properly setup adguard.

What routers are people using now that are reliable and will let me control my own network configuration

  • floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Check out the OpenWRT Table of Hardware, it has a list of firmware mod-able off the shelf WiFi routers that work with, you guessed it, OpenWRT. It’s rather versatile as it’s Linux based and can handle VLANs, multiple SSIDs, and of course, you can change the DNS servers.

    • victoitor@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This!

      If you want a Linux router instead of a BSD one for hardware compatibility, it will run on anything pfsense or opnsense will run and on much much more.

  • hempster@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mikrotik. The depth and breadth of a tiny Hex S is mind blowing.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      What i love about Mikrotik is. You buy it once and own it. Unlike something like Cisco or Juniper. You got tons of licensing fees.

    • Outcide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I converted everything over to Mikrotik earlier this year. Excellent hardware and software and cheap. But has a bit of a learning curve.

    • Feliberto@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been using my Hex S for 4 years and couldn’t been happier. It’s crashed on me the total amount of zero times.

    • ronflex@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love my Microtik hEX S. It takes a minute to get used to the menus, but I really like how everything is laid out and managing using winbox. For 70 bucks it has a hell of a lot of features.

      Before that I used a Ubiquiti Edgerouter X which I liked pretty well but I was not a fan of the web interface, it felt very dated; I also had issues with certain firmware updates that made the device pretty unstable. Eventually it kind of just died so I replaced it with this. I think I paid $50 for the ER-X, definitely recommend spending a little more for the hEX S.

      One thing the hEX S can not do (at least that I have found) that the ER-X can that I care about is running a MDNS repeater. I have a couple subnets including one for IoT devices so this is necessary, as a slightly jank solution I ended up spinning up an Ubuntu server VM with separate NICs on the subnets I wanted to repeat between and running this binary to do the deed: https://github.com/geekman/mdns-repeater - if anyone knows of a better solution plz let me know.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like mikrotik, but if you’re not familiar with routers and their configurations, then it’s going to be a steep learning curve.

      The hex S is wonderful. I don’t have one but I keep going back to look at it and weigh my options.

      I don’t need another router, I really don’t. But it’s so nice! But I don’t need it!

      I have Juniper, Cisco, watchguard, sonicwall, ubiquiti… So many routers and firewalls, I really do not need another one.

      But I want one.

      • milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Can confirm, I bit the bullet for a CR2004 last year and it took me a couple of weeks at least to set it up the way I wanted. Powerful, but steep with a capital S.

  • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What I did is I bought a cheap small PC with an Intel chip (i5), some RAM and an SSD. You can find these with more than one NIC pretty easily from Amazon, and they are just normal computers: only small and quiet. Then go with a virtualization platform such as Proxmox, and to that, install opnSense as the router distribution and use the rest of the processing power to run everything else in your house in virtual machines: Home Assistant, media server, you name it… Just search Amazon with something like “router pc” and you get a long list of machines below and over 200 euros that are more than enough for your home. Computers like this one.

    The great thing about opnSense is how it gets regular updates. And when you use a normal PC as your router, you run the latest FreeBSD kernel and get updates basically as long as opnSense is developed.

    You probably also want a Wi-Fi. These boxes usually miss it, and even when they have a Wi-Fi card, opnSense is not really great for setting wireless networks. I just bought a few APs from Ubiquiti. They are a bit on the expensive side, but I just don’t need to touch these things after setting them up and the network never fails on me. There are also much cheaper APs in the market, just get anything that fits to your budget and plug it to the router.

    • modesto_hagney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did this for a while, but decided to just run opnsense on bare metal, I didn’t want my whole network going down if I had to restart Proxmox or something. It’s way overkill but it’s running opnsense, adguard and will soon be running ngnix hopefully.

      • pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also a good choice. What I like about opnSense is how it’s basically just a distribution you update from the shell, feels more like a real operating system compared to OpenWRT, which is usually flashed to the router.

  • indigomirage@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pfsense is fantastic. Extremely flexible. I am contemplating switching to opensense when it’s time for an upgrade (it’s been running seamlessly for many years, but someday I’ll need to).

    Note that it’s a router, not a wireless access point. For that I use a few Ubiquity APs (I forget the model).

    • Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just ordered a Netgate SG-1100 and I am beyond excited to spend the next few days seeing what this thing can do.

    • ronflex@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      pfSense is indeed fantastic. The best part about it is you can install it on pretty much anything, as long as you have a couple reasonably fast network interfaces and an okay-ish processor depending on the network load it will just work. Also has OpenVPN server baked in which is pretty cool

      • teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also comes with a dyndns-client built in. Very useful for updating the address of the OpenVPN server.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surprised to see no mention of the Edgerouter X in this thread so far.

    Honestly, if you’re looking for a simple, highly customizable router that comes with its own hardware, and don’t mind supplying a separate access point, you really can do a lot worse than the ERX. They’re small, highly affordable, use very little power, and it’s all just Debian under the hood so you can do an astonishing amount with them.

    • subtle_inquisitor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah this is what I’ve been running for the last few years. Incredibly stable and does everything that you want for a small network. Even has poe passthrough if your AP supports that

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly, your average SOHO router can easily be turned into a good enough access point. I’m using an old Asus router for mine. A Ubiquity access point is also a solid choice for cost vs performance. Or give TP-Link a look, they’re always a decent bet for wireless.

      • polyp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a ubiquity commerical AP, though only because I happened to get it for free. It’s probably overkill for home needs.

    • polyp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have been using this for years and cannot recommend it enough. It’s literally the perfect home router in my opinion. Highly customizable, affordable, small, no gimped features “for ease of use” or whatever bs and extremely stable - I have never once had to touch it or reboot it after setting it up, which is more than I can say for any other router. The only downside is that you do have supply an AP separately.

      • droans@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a great little machine. The downside, though, is that it’s not that powerful at all. With hardware offload enabled and features like QoS turned off, you’ll get about ~600mbps of max total bandwidth shared between up/down.

        For most people that shouldn’t be an issue, though.

    • crimsdings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Can confirm - I am on an edgerouter x for years now - you can do anything you want with it. It’s not casual friendly - just keep that in mind.

  • t0mxD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you don’t want to go the route with building your own hardware there is also mikrotik with which I’m pretty happy. Something like the hex s is pretty cheap and has a sfp port if you have fiber.

    • pete@social.cyano.at
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Excellent choice. I’m running a physical Routerboard and a virtual RouterOS inside my hypervisor for redundancy.
      The license for virtual RouterOS is dirt cheap and has more features than you could ever dream of with any of the the big network device manufacturers.
      The physical devices are very well designed for their relatively modest price and likewise fully featured. Perfect for any home lab or to play around with IEEE conform protocols.

  • AngryDemonoid@lemmy.lylapol.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve got a Mikrotik RB4011, and I couldn’t be happier with it. It definitely has a learning curve, but once I got it setup how I want, it just works. I’m sure some other options have the same feature, but one of my favorite things is a script I have run every night that emails me a backup.

    I’ve only ever had to use it a few times, but having a recent backup of my router on hand all the time is nice.

    • walden@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been very happy with my RB5009. I ditched my Edgrouter X because it’s not getting software updates anymore. Pros and cons to both, but Mikrotik/RouterOS is starting to make a lot more sense to me, and at this point I’m more comfortable with it than I ever was with EdgeOS.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally anything that’s not ISP provided should give you the flexibility to set your own network parameters, but if you want strong flexibility beyond that, I’m going to throw my recommendation to opnSense, it’s a fork of pfSense and the only reason I like it over pfSense is that the interface is very different and to me, it makes a lot more sense in how it’s laid out.

    That’s personal preference, YMMV.

    For consumer gear, ubiquiti has some strong units, the ER-X is pretty reasonable, but the unifi line is somewhat more beginner friendly, but tends to bury advanced features a little bit, focusing more on usage and reporting of activity and such.

    Lower end consumer, the usual contenders are tp-link, and Netgear, though I lean more towards stuff from Asus, or anything on the dd-wrt compatibility lists… I ran a Linksys WRT54GL for a long time because of dd-wrt. I haven’t kept up with the “wrt” variants over time… The last time I touched dd-wrt was on a relatively high end (at the time) Asus router and it did very well… Might be work looking into. There’s usually a trick to getting wrt firmware into a router though, and it will likely void your warranty, so buyer beware.

    Circling back… My biggest issue with opnSense and pfSense, is the choice of hardware, unless you’re buying direct from pfSense’s netgate product line, you’ll have to source something to run it on, and my biggest issue with that, personally, is that I want something small, like a router, IMO, should be, at least smaller than most PC’s, that’s relatively inexpensive, with at least two built in ethernet ports, since I’ve found that USB ethernet options are generally not very reliable. And usually, I can find something small and cheap, but there’s only one ethernet port, or I can find something cheap with plenty of networking, but it’s not small, or I can find something small with plenty of networking, but it’s not cheap.

    So I’m running a sonicwall at home, because fuck all this other junk, I just want something that does what I want it to do without hiding all my options behind some garbage, or a system that can only work a particular way, and you don’t get options to change it. Or something that’s huge or expensive… Or something I have to spend a lot of time setting up, maintaining, or fixing. For me, that’s sonicwall.

    • peregus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I opted for a Fujitsu Futro S720. It has only 1 Ethernet, but you can add a second one with a PCI x4 card. Used are very cheap and consumes about 6W (if I’m not mistaken).

    • acqrs@acqrs.co.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is also similar reasoning and why I went with a mikrotik router. All the functionality I need, none of the bullshit, solid performance for price. Only downside is the setup isn’t trivial, but if you’re comfortable on the command line, it’s a breeze.

  • gazby@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I run OpenWRT on a RaspberryPi and it’s great. Happy to answer questions.

    • Lem453@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You can also get cheaper mini PC’s on Alibaba for cheap. I did this in 2017 and it’s still going strong. No moving parts, all passively cooked with an Intel laptop chip that has hardware encryption built in (core i5).

      Been using opnsense since the start and it’s been rock solid.

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s depend on how deep you want to go with router customization. Most casual enthusiasts would do fine using an Asus router. Out of the box, the firmware is based on an opensource firmware (Tomato) and has a lot of features and options compared to their competitors. Feature-wise, it already blows other consumer-grade routers out of water. And because the firmware’s source is available, third-party firmware (asuswrt-merlin) is thriving and can be flashed with zero risk while adding a whole bunch of new features and customization options.

    If you want something more, then your only options are using enterprise-grade routers (e.g. mikrotik, ubiquity, etc). Just note that these enterprise gears usually don’t have latest WiFi tech (or even WiFi at all!), so you’ll still need to buy another wifi access point and hook them downsteam of the router.

  • Acid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you have a pi kicking around or a docker instance of pihole you can use it to take over dhcp of the router and then set the dns servers in pihole.

    That’s what I do currently on my home hub

    • flashgnash@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That might be the way to do it. I’m somewhat unfamiliar with networking, what does DHCP do?

      • SmoothIsFast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        DHCP strands for dynamic host control protocol. It is a server that assigns dynamic IP addresses to devices on the network which request it.

        • flashgnash@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the pi takes over dchp and assigns itsself as a DNS server? I assume if I want to assign static IPs I have to do it through the pi from then on?

          Can’t use pihole because I’m running NixOS on my pi and the only way to run it is via docker container (which melts down my system, believe it’s trying to emulate x86 for some reason)