Proposal sails through, with one vocal opponent saying gay first cousins do not risk having a child with birth defects

Proposal sails through, with one vocal opponent saying gay first cousins do not risk having a child with birth defects

Archived version: https://archive.ph/Ri2sc

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.eeEnglish
    2·
    9 months ago

    Hmm, interesting problem where I don’t exactly have a good answer. But I would still support some form of criminalisation. If I fed my 3 year old cocaine while knowing it was cocaine, should I not be jailed for abuse? Is this situation not similar?

    • hitmyspot
      3·
      9 months ago

      No, because feeding a child cocaine isnillegal and reckless. Having protected sex is not.

      • UraniumBlazer@lemm.eeEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        But deciding to continue with the pregnancy after your protected sex fails is reckless. You know your child is going to have a 50% probability of having severe genetic defects. If you still continue with the pregnancy, it is equivalent to feeding your child cocaine.

        • Pateecakes@lemmy.world
          2·
          9 months ago

          In Tennessee abortion is illegal, so they would have no choice but to continue the pregnancy. So, not really an equal comparison, since presumably you have a choice not to feed your child cocaine.