Proposal sails through, with one vocal opponent saying gay first cousins do not risk having a child with birth defects

Proposal sails through, with one vocal opponent saying gay first cousins do not risk having a child with birth defects

Archived version: https://archive.ph/Ri2sc

  • hitmyspot
    3·
    9 months ago

    No, because feeding a child cocaine isnillegal and reckless. Having protected sex is not.

    • UraniumBlazer@lemm.eeEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      But deciding to continue with the pregnancy after your protected sex fails is reckless. You know your child is going to have a 50% probability of having severe genetic defects. If you still continue with the pregnancy, it is equivalent to feeding your child cocaine.

      • Pateecakes@lemmy.world
        2·
        9 months ago

        In Tennessee abortion is illegal, so they would have no choice but to continue the pregnancy. So, not really an equal comparison, since presumably you have a choice not to feed your child cocaine.