or with parental consent.
Eww, that line tells you all you need to know about this guy. And the fact that this is actually legal in some states is disturbing.
He prefers a woman who is “damaged” because he thinks she’ll put up with being treated like a broodmare.
As if he even needed to say that, the only people who would respond to this would be especially damaged lol.
Let’s not give him that much credit, a woman is acceptable but he’d prefer a child who is damaged, with parental consent of course.
I have a feeling he doesn’t really care that much about consent, parental or otherwise. I think that was just a dog whistle for “I like fucking kids” without actually incriminating himself.
At 53 at that. Ugh.
🤢
That’s mudblood talk.
53 and looking for someone “of age or with parental consent”?
Excuse me while I go and vomit.
Yeah, I’m getting divorced at 35 and matching with women younger than 30 freaks me out. This mf’r wants a 17yr old? Yuck.
Possibly younger with parental consent!
Wonder how young it can be by Texas laws, but also don’t want to look it up and be put on a watchlist.
If you’re not trying to help someone get an abortion or gender-affirming care, you’re probably safe. Those are the real issues! (Sarcastic, if not clear, and referencing the absurd reporting websites some states have set up)
According to Wikipedia, Texas doesn’t have a “with parental consent” law. If he’s 53, she’s gotta be 17 or older. They wouldn’t be able to get married until she turned 18.
I got divorced in my late 20s, and started dating again around 30. A girl I had met who was 21 asked me why I hadn’t asked her out, and the truth was she seemed way out of my league - very attractive person, very bright. So I went out with her, and she was nice, but I just couldn’t do it because she seemed so young. Not immature, just young. And it was so strange going out with someone who hadn’t even seen the same TV shows as I watched growing up, which sounds superficial, but it was honestly weird.
I just can’t imagine dating someone decades younger than me. An underage person with a 53-year-old is just gross.
Feel ya. I was 50 and some young neighbors were hanging out one Saturday, 20-yo or so. I noticed a friend’s hands were absolutely perfect, beautiful hands. Slim, long, porcelain white.
And it grossed me out. They looked like doll’s hands, a child’s hands. Eww.
My wife, same age, doesn’t understand why I so love her hands. They have age, maturity, I love them.
Anyways, this dude freaks me out.
Valuing each other’s “mileage” is so wholesome and needs to be normalized. Too many of us are taught we have this tiny window of being pleasing to look at before the “imperfections” start getting toted up…and it isn’t true. I can’t imagine being with someone in their early 20’s. That’s still a kid in my eyes! They need to BE a kid and experience relationships with other kids where they are equals in figuring out everything together.
My partner and I are about a year apart in age and we remember all our weird awkward growing up moments together where we struggled to figure things out and each one is a treasure. They if anything get just get more and more attractive with age.
I genuinely don’t understand this thinking. The idea of partnering with someone who doesn’t share a similar life experience sounds difficult and frustrating.
I get that they’re not looking to partner with anyone and that’s the point.
Fuck vomiting. The dude needs to be monitored 24/7 and forced to take therapy.
Not how therapy works but okay
I guess fuck me for wanting to treat humans like people instead of subjecting them to the horrible conditions of prison.
But also, yes that is how therapy can work
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3578041/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474319/
But I guess since you think it doesn’t work that way we shouldn’t at least try. That’s definitely a better choice. Great job.
You can’t force a person into therapy for a few months and it “just work”. Mental health, especially habits and beliefs, aren’t some easy to solve problems “if only they went to therapy for a bit”. If they don’t want to change (which they won’t if they are forced into it) means it is just a waste of everyone’s time.
Can you point to where I said "just work” and “if only they went to therapy for a bit”?
I must be blind because I don’t see where I said either of those things.
It’s clear you didn’t even bother to even look at either of the articles I posted before just saying whatever you think is correct.
Stop spouting bad information because it’s what you want to believe.
Removed by mod
I provided links to peer reviewed articles and all you’ve got is ad hominem attacks. Fuck off.
“… or with parental consent.”
For a 53-year-old. Mm.
Yeah. Those two parts were as separated as he could get them, and still were the only part of this I remember.
Half your age plus seven, guy. It’s in the bible, I swear. Leviticus.
Meh, I always found that a bit rigid. I don’t have a problem with a 60 and a 30 year old person getting it on if they both want it. Maybe something simple like “Don’t try to exploit immature people, you massive creep.”
A 30-yo is undoubtedly an adult. It’s more about the “needing parental permission” that makes it creepy.
I get that, and agree with that, I was just replying to the often cited “rule” mentioned by the commenter above, that I feel some are taking too seriously.
Edit: Oh, wait, you’re the commenter above. Well, I’ll just leave my comment like it is, I guess.
I was thinking the thing about Leviticus would give it away. Wasn’t the rule made up in a TV show, like Always Sunny?
Well, whenever you make a joke online, there’s bound to be someone to dense to get it. This time, that seems to have been me.
Well, the koran says between one half and one seventh your age. Checkmate atheists!
Ohh and i thought it was half my age minus seven. My bad.
Jfc I didn’t even process that on the first read. Instant creep factor x10.
Also needs to be “damaged”, not just any random happy-go-lucky minor.
Also the emphasis on ride or die tells me he’s going to be controlling right from the start. And the “follow god’s instincts” tells me he thinks his instincts are god’s.
Yeah that made me physically shudder.
“or with parental consent”
deleted by creator
Nobody cares.
Alright? I didn’t need anyone to.
It’s the @yahoo.com that fully sent me.
Only an @aol.com would have been better.
I regularly see roadrunner and earthlink emails as well as AOL at my job.
i mean, in terms of accounts, email is the hardest to change from, and you can use most any client with email accounts
That’s why I didn’t edit the whole thing. It could only be better if it was Hotmail.
I feel offended. Dafuq is wrong with hotmail?! Imho, it’s pretty awesome that microsoft still supports it after all these years. Got mine when I was 10 and I plan om keeping it untill I die. It’s a better relic than a beany baby.
It’s like a comfy pair of sweats right?
This was really funny until that last part. What the fuck
Yeah, what kind of sick fuck uses Yahoo email…
Thinking of emailing him and just saying “I give parental consent, send me your credit card”.
This guy has a breeding kink and decided to post it on FB.
It’s not a kink if you believe God told you to do it.
Then it’s just a cult.
A sad cult with one member
Shooters shoot their shot
Man, giving internet access to the unhinged might have been a bad idea but it IS very entertaining to say the least.
Did he get parental consent to procreate? We should talk to his mom and dad
I’d say these people need Jesus… but they’d shoot Jesus for trespassing.
defend the border!
“I’m real.” Obviously, he sounds too good to be true…
To paraphrase Serenity,
“Ah, BonesOfTheMoon, you always bring me the very best insanity.”
Ahahahahah. I’m here to serve. This is what I get for being a fake Nazi on Facebook.
Oof, talking about taking one for the team… Your service is much appreciated. 🫡
Nazis are the most humorless people on earth. That’s why they are Nazis. Take it from me.
I’m real
Such a perfect specimen of manliness surely can’t exist in our cold, imperfect reality.
I genuinely thought I was reading /c/lemmy_shitpost - great googilly moogilly
Goodness gracious laventacious
The rest of you are correct. I want to loop back to the start.
“God’s instincts”? The fuck man. The church of my youth would string him up for suggesting that either “God operates on instinct” or that “human’s should operate on instinct”.
