• EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    10 months ago

    So you think they should have ignored the will of the Democrat voters to prop up another candidate who probably would have lost even worse?

    • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, somebody sure wasn’t paying attention to reality… but that’s none of my business 🐸 🍵 🫖

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        10 months ago

        Clinton absolutely crushed sanders. I’m not sure what you believe reality looks like. But if it ain’t that, then you should probably look elsewhere for that insult.

        • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Looks like a lot of people don’t agree with your gaslighting.

          Clinton did not “cRuSh sAnDerS”

          The DNC (Debbie Wasserman Schultz), Barbara Boxer, Donna Brazile and others) did.

          Also the nefarious “counting and reporting” on sUpeRdELeGaTes before their votes had even been cast— thus trying to manipulate the public. It really left a very foul taste and I remember it well.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Looks like a lot of people don’t agree with your gaslighting.

            This is like going onto The_Donald and pointing out that he is a convicted rapist, and a fraud who tried to steal an election. . .and when inevitably when you get tons of downvotes someone saying “Looks like a lot of people don’t agree with your gaslighting.” lol

            Clinton did not “cRuSh sAnDerS”

            She won by 12 percentage points in the popular vote. Removing super delegates, she won 57% of the delegates.

            It was never in doubt. She was the overwhelming favorite, right from the start. This didn’t stop me from holding out hope, BTW.

            You might be upset with how it was run (or how it was reported? Which is funny because the media made it look like Sanders had a much better chance than he had. Remember, an actual race is more interesting than a blowout), but the simple fact is that Clinton was just a far more popular candidate than Sanders. Neither us thinks it should be the case, but that’s the general democrat voter. It’s time to move on and accept the facts, instead of posting in alternating caps as if that makes the facts go away.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                You are rejecting the facts. What you are doing is showing what people do when they are dealing with the cognitive dissonance of pretending that Republicans are dumb for ignoring the evidence and believing the election was fraudulent, while trying to simultaneously ignoring the evidence that the 2016 nomination was rigged and that Clinton didn’t crush Sanders.

                But, don’t worry, just like Trump supporters, you’re too far gone at this point and thus are impenetrable to facts. So I don’t expect you to come around. I’m just posting this so any other person who comes along will realize that your position doesn’t come from a place of rational thought.

                • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  >So I don’t expect you to come around. I’m just posting this so any other person who comes along will realize that your position doesn’t come from a place of rational thought.

                  any intellectually honest user who reads this thread can only conclude that the nomination was rigged.

                • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  *your version

                  There is documentary video evidence of what Barbara Boxer did.

                  Stop gaslighting.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agreed. Forget the primary, which I do believe was tilted for Clinton, Sanders would have been smashed flat in the general election.