The Supreme Courtā€™s decision to hear Donald Trumpā€™s claim that he should be shielded from criminal prosecution keeps the justices at the center of election-year controversy for several more months and means any verdict on Trumpā€™s alleged subversion of the 2020 vote will not come before summer.

The countryā€™s highest court wants the final word on the former presidentā€™s assertion of immunity, even if it may ultimately affirm a comprehensive ruling of the lower federal court that rejected Trumpā€™s sweeping claim.

For Trump, Wednesdayā€™s order amounts to another win from the justice system he routinely attacks. The justicesā€™ intervention in the case, Trump v. United States, also marks another milestone in the fraught relationship between the court and the former president.

Cases related to his policies and his personal dealings consistently roiled the justices behind the scenes. At the same time, Trump, who appointed three of the nine justices, significantly influenced the courtā€™s lurch to the right, most notably its 2022 reversal of nearly a half century of abortion rights and reproductive freedom.

  • RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    24
    Ā·
    9 months ago

    No, the Supreme Court is not ā€œhelpingā€ Donald Trump. This is just a rage-bait news piece, and the people who swallow the intimation that the Court is taking the case in order to get Donald Trump elected are falling for it. The Supreme Court isnā€™t playing kingmaker. They are doing their job.

    • gloss@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      9 months ago

      How exactly do you know the motives of the extreme conservative Justices, half of whom were appointed by Trump? Are you a mind reader?

      Your comment is the real rage bait.

      • RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        Ā·
        9 months ago

        How exactly do you know the motives of the extreme conservative Justices, half of whom were appointed by Trump? Are you a mind reader?

        Thatā€™s my point.

        We donā€™t know what the motives are of the Supreme Court. Yet because people who want to see Trump removed from the ballot didnā€™t get the decision they want to see fast enough, theyā€™re inventing conspiracy theories of the Supreme Court manipulating things to benefit Trump, and the media is playing right along, saying theyā€™re ā€œhelpingā€ him. Itā€™s precisely this kind of behavior that makes me despise the far right. (Well, not just this behavior, but still.)

        I donā€™t want to see Donald Trump anywhere near the oval office ever again. But I do want to see a decision from the Supreme Court on this specific question, because I want to forever silence the people who have been trying to create a ā€œunitary executiveā€ in the United States.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      9 months ago

      Theyā€™re helping Trump if they slow walk this urgent case. If theyā€™re speedy, as justice must be, then, and only then, are they doing their jobs.

      • RotaryKeyboard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        Ā·
        9 months ago

        And they are being unusually speedy. The article even says as much.

        Overall, the timetable is fast compared to the regular calendar for high court briefing, oral arguments, and eventual resolution, which typically plays out over many months or close to a year. (Other cases accepted this month for review will not be heard until next fall, with decisions likely in 2025.)