Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) went after former President Trump for his legal woes in an interview on MSNBC Saturday.

“I’ll take the individual who’s 81 over the guy who has 91 felony counts,” Swalwell said, making a reference to President Biden’s age in an interview on MSNBC’s “The Katie Phang Show” on Saturday.

“It’s not about two individuals,” Swalwell continued, speaking about the 2024 election. “It’s about the idea of competence versus chaos, or even greater, freedom versus fascism. If we make it about those ideas, and what they mean in our daily lives, we’re gonna win.”

Swalwell’s comments come after Trump was ordered to pay almost $355 million in penalties in a civil fraud case and amid increased scrutiny faced by the president on his age and memory in the wake of a special counsel report on Biden’s handling of classified documents. The report noted that Biden had problems with memory and recall.

  • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    If you weren’t an irrational idealist that is a net detriment to American society you would vote Biden and donate money to STAR and RCV initiatives.

    • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      calling me irrational and a detriment to society are personal attacks. they don’t make me want to vote for someone whose policies i don’t like.

      • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I would call someone who litters an irrational detriment to society. Is that a personal attack? Is it not irrational to pollute your own environment? Is it a benefit to society to litter?

        You’re doing the wrong thing and it’s ok for me to tell you it’s wrong and why.

        • HACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          saying that the act is irrational or that **someone** who does it is acting irrationally is one thing, but to directly call someone irrational **is** a personal attack.