Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoHawaii rules against public carrying of guns without permit citing ‘aloha spirit’www.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square200fedilinkarrow-up1719arrow-down112
arrow-up1707arrow-down1external-linkHawaii rules against public carrying of guns without permit citing ‘aloha spirit’www.theguardian.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square200fedilink
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up35arrow-down7·edit-24 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·8 months ago So the more guns there are the less gun crime That is not the claim
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-24 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·8 months agoA gun allows physically weaker people to defend themselves from physically stronger people
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-24 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 months agoIn the example only the initial victim had a gun, presumably the ‘burliest of asailants’ was using physical strength as their weapon.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·8 months agoNo it is not, you are saying two completely different things. Does having a pilots livense reduce your likelihood of dying in plane crash? Vs Does having a pilots license give you the ability to be responsible for your own safety in plane? Two completely different things
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·edit-24 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·8 months ago having a gun to defend yourself from someone with a gun works No, it’s that it grants you the opportunity to defend yourself, not that you can. (more guns reducing gun crime) That is not what that means. Nowhere is that claimed. Maybe ask ChatGPT to rephrase it for you.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·edit-24 months agoRemoved by mod
Removed by mod
That is not the claim
Removed by mod
A gun allows physically weaker people to defend themselves from physically stronger people
Removed by mod
In the example only the initial victim had a gun, presumably the ‘burliest of asailants’ was using physical strength as their weapon.
No it is not, you are saying two completely different things.
Does having a pilots livense reduce your likelihood of dying in plane crash?
Vs
Does having a pilots license give you the ability to be responsible for your own safety in plane?
Two completely different things
Removed by mod
No, it’s that it grants you the opportunity to defend yourself, not that you can.
That is not what that means. Nowhere is that claimed. Maybe ask ChatGPT to rephrase it for you.
Removed by mod