• YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      I have no idea how this wasn’t a lower hanging fruit. If theres one social service I want federated, its a git server.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        These are large existing code-bases that where developed without federation in mind. Gitlab also started working on AP federation, but like with Forgejo it looks like a multi-year project that it involves a lot of refactoring of the code.

        • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I suppose I meant so far as priorities, I wasn’t clear. Hosting OSS seems like it would be one of the first things to federate imo.

      • ViaFedi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        A central search engine would be a great start. Search across gitlab, github, codeberg etc.

      • Spedwell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        What even is federation in the context of a distributed vcs like Git? Does it mean federation of the typical dev ops tools (issues, PRs, etc.)?

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Well, I mean, it’s been like that from the beginning. You don’t open a pull request to the Linux kernel through a web UI, you tell git to send Linus an email with your changes.